tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36926499288202742032024-03-12T16:25:29.123-07:00T.E. Lawrence: A Biographical ReviewReviews, commentaries and analysis of biographies of T.E. Lawrence (1888-1935) by an amateur Lawrence enthusiast.Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.comBlogger32125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-65412387345027463242015-10-04T20:04:00.000-07:002015-10-04T20:04:43.337-07:00Lawrence's Gravesite Threatened<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiMVPKafmkGpi71ib8lIDnF3SCHVPtHMIKYumnElc9ju746gg0BxF4gkT_xIvn48SuX2FHXyFkiC5QBkPiwhtkfz41xNZvq8ywrUK7f2pi9AsWTxBbTKWB60RpOmYM41grKAD3bSHnBRmRt/s1600/Lawrence+Grave.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="179" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiMVPKafmkGpi71ib8lIDnF3SCHVPtHMIKYumnElc9ju746gg0BxF4gkT_xIvn48SuX2FHXyFkiC5QBkPiwhtkfz41xNZvq8ywrUK7f2pi9AsWTxBbTKWB60RpOmYM41grKAD3bSHnBRmRt/s320/Lawrence+Grave.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
Big news from England: Lawrence's <a href="http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/13716264._TE_Lawrence__village_quarry_plan_consultation_extended/">gravesite in Moreton is under threat</a> from quarry development. Fortunately, action by local Dorset citizens and the T.E. Lawrence Society has delayed a decision until October 23rd. Unfortunately, it's still likely that development will continue.<br />
<br />
Any interested parties can read more about the issue <a href="http://consult.dorsetforyou.com/portal/draft_minerals_plan?pointId=768323">here</a> and <a href="https://www.change.org/p/dorset-county-council-let-lawrence-of-arabia-rest-in-peace/u/13426868">here</a>, or <a href="https://www.change.org/p/dorset-county-council-let-lawrence-of-arabia-rest-in-peace?recruiter=244601146&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink">sign a petition</a> against further development.Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-30038355525349600812014-04-09T18:44:00.002-07:002014-04-09T20:03:41.029-07:00Lawrence, The Uncrowned King of Arabia (1998, Michael Asher)<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhDoZ725D1HMZTHscjrjDFQnd2RKbURFMSNbT8AWHZlt7ycaJ78qjHkxlHfWU_jopW9A-Gk47AiyIojRuALz-vJno-3znDrlLUQh-6IlEu002zpHf0UKKVFAW-pg7yL1hDDP3gTIDBk4oj3/s1600/Lawrence+Uncrowned+King.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhDoZ725D1HMZTHscjrjDFQnd2RKbURFMSNbT8AWHZlt7ycaJ78qjHkxlHfWU_jopW9A-Gk47AiyIojRuALz-vJno-3znDrlLUQh-6IlEu002zpHf0UKKVFAW-pg7yL1hDDP3gTIDBk4oj3/s1600/Lawrence+Uncrowned+King.png" /></a></div>
<strong>Publishing Info</strong><br />
<br />
Asher, Michael. <em>Lawrence, the Uncrowned King of Arabia</em>. New York: Overlook Press, 1998. 419 pp.<br />
<br />
<strong>Introduction</strong><br />
<br />
Michael Asher is a fine author with several worthwhile books to his credit (I'm especially fond of <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Khartoum-The-Ultimate-Imperial-Adventure/dp/0140258558">Khartoum: The Ultimate Imperial Adventure</a></em>, his account of the Mahdist Wars in Anglo-Egyptian Sudan). Sadly, T.E. Lawrence isn't so well-served by Asher's pen. Rather than the promised groundbreaking "major biography," <em>Lawrence, The Uncrowned King of Arabia</em> mainly rehashes other biographies with little originality or insight.<br />
<br />
<strong>The Author</strong><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjvdtiokHxXQyt2GxQJr2Hdo8EehgLNGtKQDc2AqFFgiOzyUY0ueRjtDblUfazeE1Gi9WZkpLTxdwJA1XAVgUgu4m28PpheWPfKE1WcBMeGWmbZdDpigtj30xce76_JzGW1vIWoPU9bDMj2/s1600/Asher.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjvdtiokHxXQyt2GxQJr2Hdo8EehgLNGtKQDc2AqFFgiOzyUY0ueRjtDblUfazeE1Gi9WZkpLTxdwJA1XAVgUgu4m28PpheWPfKE1WcBMeGWmbZdDpigtj30xce76_JzGW1vIWoPU9bDMj2/s1600/Asher.jpg" /></a></div>
Michael Asher (b. 1953) graduated from the University of Leeds, and served in the Parachute Regiment and later the SAS. He later relocated to Africa, beginning a career as teacher, Arabist, explorer and ecologist. Asher's written both nonfiction works and novels, including the popular <em>Death or Glory</em> series, and produced several television documentaries. He currently lives in Nairobi with his wife, photographer and teacher Marieantoniette Peru.<br />
<br />
<strong>The Review</strong><br />
<br />
Asher is a fine narrative historian: he's got a flare for battle writing and character sketches, making even topographical descriptions compelling. When <em>Uncrowned King</em> trades analysis for adventure, it comes to life: Asher recounts familiar battles like Aqaba and Tafileh, locations like Wadi Rumm and personages like Feisal and Auda in typically colorful fashion. One wishes Asher had done a history of the Arab Revolt a la James Barr or David Murphy rather than a biography.<br />
<br />
For Asher breaks little new ground. His early chapters liberally mix the interpretations of Richard Aldington (focus on Lawrence's dishonesty) and John E. Mack (probing for psychological explanations of Lawrence's behavior). Hence the fixation on Sarah Lawrence, again depicted as a whip-happy sadist, whose floggings molded Lawrence's attitude towards sex. Hence also the emphasis on Lawrence as a "sensitive" young child (26), as if this were a prerequisite for homosexuality. <br />
<br />
Asher revisits Lawrence's old haunts, interviews Bedouin (who largely dismiss Lawrence) and tries to recreate his feats. He devotes one chapter to an attempt by himself, his wife and two Arab guides to replicate Lawrence's 48 hour crossing of the Sinai Peninsula. These segments are entertaining and persuasive. Cynics might conclude that Asher's failure doesn't automatically discount Lawrence's ability to do so. But Asher's expert enough that his conclusions at least provide food for thought - subjective, but more convincing than other logical leaps.<br />
<br />
Asher fixates on minor stories to paint Lawrence as a habitual liar. Two prewar letters, where Lawrence relates an anecdote involving bells on a caravan (changing from camels to mules) draw significant analysis: "it's hardly likely that Lawrence could have in the space of a month forgotten what kind of animals they were" (34). Even if we accept Asher's insinuation, so what? We're reminded of Aldington smugly debunking Lawrence's self-consciously absurd claim of reading 50,000 books at Oxford.<br />
<br />
Using such trivia, and more substantive incidents like Deraa, Asher argues that Lawrence expressed "reverse exhibitionism" (20). His famous self-denial and "horror of being known to like being known" mask a crippling martyr complex. Thus he takes on responsibility for events and failures not his own, like the Tafas Massacre, and the Arab Revolt's ultimate collapse. Asher uses Mack and other psychologists like Lyn Cowan to bolster his analysis, yet often leans on speculation.<br />
<br />
Similarly, Asher reads Lawrence's employing literary allusions as proof of unreliability. When Lawrence unfavorably compares Farraj's demise to Daniel Corkery's <em>Hounds of Banba</em> (310), he's not claiming dissatisfaction with his writing. For Asher, this means it never happened. Deraa becomes a coded admission of sexuality: "It was, perhaps, his final declaration to the world of his conviction... that he was untouchable and unclean" (295). Like Desmond Stewart, he doubts Farraj and Daud even existed, or that Lawrence executed Hamed the Moor. <br />
<br />
Asher stands on firmer ground analyzing Bedouin culture. Asher draws heavily on personal experience, so these passages ring with authenticity that much of the book lacks. From his personal experiences, interviews and analysis, Asher's portrait effectively casts doubt on <em>Seven Pillars</em>' account of tribal lifestyles. He questions Lawrence's assertion that homosexuality is commonplace among the Bedouin, writing that "the merest suggestion of it would be like to bring out daggers" (233).<br />
<br />
Asher critiques Lawrence and other biographers for Orientalism, but he's not above aureate prose when it suits him. Describing the Bedouin lifestyle, he becomes positively picturesque: (p.155)<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
They lived not by material wealth... but by the cult of reputation. A man gained honor by displaying courage, endurance, hospitality, generosity and loyalty, and while no strange caravan, nor traveler, nor rival tent was free from his depredations, there was no more honorable traveling companion nor host once he had shared bread and salt. Raiding for camels was the spice of his life, and a means of acquiring reputation, and his hand was turned against every man, unless it suited him. His services could be bought with gold, but his soul could not.</blockquote>
<br />
<br />
Not since Flora Armitage's <em>The Desert and the Stars</em> has a biographer employed such florid verbiage.<br />
<br />
More egregiously, Asher peppers his text with dialogue from <em>Lawrence of Arabia</em>. Hence Dahoum finds England "a fat country, full of fat people" (110), while Alec Kirkbride thinks Lawrence has "a horror of bloodshed" (334). Hence Lawrence initiates Tafas by shrieking "No prisoners!" (331) instead of <em>Seven Pillars</em>' "The best of you brings me the most Turkish dead!" No biographer can entirely avoid David Lean's shadow, but directly quoting him is a temptation best avoided.<br />
<br />
Asher's text contains other oddities. There are niggling errors, like his claim that Feisal's nemesis Abd el-Kadr died in November 1917 (286) (off by a year) or that Aldington published his biographical enquiry in "the '60s" (353) (off by a decade). There are odd misjudgments, like reducing General Allenby and Lawrence's French allies to bit players. There are also unaccountable elisions: Asher compresses Lawrence's entire postwar life into two terse chapters. So much for a "major biography."<br />
<br />
Most often <em>Lawrence, the Uncrowned King of Arabia</em> is unremarkable when not inadequate. Just sixteen years on, Asher's work has already been eclipsed by Michael Korda and Scott Anderson's far more comprehensive (and persuasive) tomes. In contrast, <em>King</em> is a pedestrian work that contributes little to a crowded field.Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-86473705742957511532014-04-08T19:06:00.001-07:002014-04-08T19:06:13.842-07:00Lawrence discoveries and publishingsIt's been almost seven months since our last post. Time to check in.<br />
<br />
Three recent items might interest Lawrence enthusiasts:.<br />
<br />
We'll start with a noteworthy archaeological find: the discovery of a wartime camp, used by Lawrence and his allies, at Tooth Hill in Jordan by the Great Arab Revolt Project, in conjunction with Bristol University. <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2587193/Secret-desert-camp-used-First-World-War-hero-Lawrence-Arabia-discovered-intact-rum-jars-campfire.html">The Daily Mail</a> has a detailed article along with photographs.<br />
<br />
Secondly, Dr. Ali A. Allawi's (former Defense Minister of Iraq) biography of Emir Faisal has recently been published in America. So far as I'm aware, this marks the first English-language biography of Lawrence's friend and ally, and is worth seeking out for that reason alone. The Wall Street Journal has a detailed review <a href="http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304679404579459300529199872">here</a>.<br />
<br />
Finally, there's fiction news from this blog's friend, novelist/historian Benedicta Froelich. She recently <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=it&u=http://www.varesereport.it/2013/05/26/premio-morselli-2013-trionfa-benedicta-con-il-mitico-lawrence-darabia/&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dbenedicta%2Bfroelich%2Bnella%2Bsua%2Bquiete%26safe%3Doff%26biw%3D1366%26bih%3D673">published her novel</a> <em>Nella Sua Quiete</em> (<em>In His Quiet</em>), detailing Lawrence's final days at Clouds Hill. Currently, it's only in Italian, but she promises an English-language edition in the future.<br />
<br />
As for us? Expect a special article by week's end, and at least one book review in the foreseeable future. Happy reading!Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-54610932032204506632013-09-19T21:39:00.001-07:002014-04-06T08:26:55.433-07:00Lawrence in Arabia: War, Deceit, Imperial Folly and the Making of the Modern Middle East (2013, Scott Anderson)<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDK6K0KSAghA7o8at8O_LXdHY3bhY0sNQt_rkd_dIOWHtBvjiuvEMtDK3Xl67FDZTXO7mWI7ZBWxK3zLg7Sw6IhQpoHZUmGVDwb-icIYgDmACYVwCVn4RWwQ2Vq4xgPSzWADDQ2q0PJuTu/s1600/LAWRENCE+IN+ARABIA+ANDERSON.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDK6K0KSAghA7o8at8O_LXdHY3bhY0sNQt_rkd_dIOWHtBvjiuvEMtDK3Xl67FDZTXO7mWI7ZBWxK3zLg7Sw6IhQpoHZUmGVDwb-icIYgDmACYVwCVn4RWwQ2Vq4xgPSzWADDQ2q0PJuTu/s320/LAWRENCE+IN+ARABIA+ANDERSON.JPG" height="320" width="210" /></a></div>
<br />
<b>Publishing Info:</b><br />
Anderson, Scott. <i>Lawrence in Arabia: War, Deceit, Imperial Folly and the Making of the Modern Middle East</i>. New York: Doubleday, 2013. 577 pp.<br />
<br />
<b>Introduction:</b><br />
Just three years after the last major Lawrence biography (Michael Korda's <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2012/08/hero-life-and-legend-of-lawrence-of.html"><i>Hero</i></a>) comes this volume. Veteran journalist Scott Anderson further probes the Lawrence enigma, fitting him into the broader wartime canvas. In his view, "Lawrence was able to become Lawrence of Arabia because no one was paying much attention" to this marginal theater of war (3). Anderson's critical view of Lawrence nearly provides a throwback to Aldington-era skepticism.<br />
<br />
<b>The Author:</b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiyK1woRXfH8UI_UGShZnwuLwr6mErWJDKDxastKRKq0w2sRGZteb5uYvBv6vwwYPOsa-5JU_62Ox3QnaCE_S1kXPoNiPXoEtTBnBWpJMdYz0SSukLMyhTlq4wxq8db47hXAm9l5HeN7yLD/s1600/Scott+Anderson.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiyK1woRXfH8UI_UGShZnwuLwr6mErWJDKDxastKRKq0w2sRGZteb5uYvBv6vwwYPOsa-5JU_62Ox3QnaCE_S1kXPoNiPXoEtTBnBWpJMdYz0SSukLMyhTlq4wxq8db47hXAm9l5HeN7yLD/s1600/Scott+Anderson.jpg" /></a></div>
Scott Anderson is a New York-based journalist and author. As a war correspondent, Anderson covered conflicts ranging from Northern Ireland and Checnya to the Sudan. He's published several nonfiction books, along with novels including <i>Triage</i> and <i>Moonlight Hotel</i>. Anderson discusses his book with NPR <a href="http://www.npr.org/2013/08/19/209573091/lawrence-of-arabia-from-archaeologist-to-war-hero">here</a>.<br />
<br />
<b>The Review:</b><br />
As the subtitle suggests, Anderson attempts a broader view of World War's Middle Eastern Theater, focusing mainly on the Arab Revolt (though bringing Allenby's Palestinian campaign and the muddled Mesopotamian adventure in where appropriate). For that matter, he's more concerned with the war's diplomatic and political finagling than its military dimensions. In this regard it's more akin to David Fromkin's <i>A Peace to End All Peace</i>, or James Barr's <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2012/07/setting-desert-on-fire-te-lawrence-and.html"><i>Setting the Desert on Fire</i></a>, than a straight biography.<br />
<br />
To flesh out his narrative, Anderson compares Lawrence with several contemporaries. These are Aaron Aaronsohn, the agricultural expert-turned-Zionist agent who became an intelligence asset to the British (see also Ronald Florence's <i>Lawrence and Aaronsohn</i>); Curt Prufer, Germany's chief intelligence operative in Turkey; and William Yale, a Standard Oil official who became General Allenby's American military attache. Anderson argues that in this military backwater, "these men drew upon a very particular set of personality traits... to both forge their own destiny and alter the course of history" (4).<br />
<br />
These individuals are interesting in their own right, and occasionally clarify Lawrence's story. For instance, Anderson uses Prufer's correspondence to demonstrate that Lawrence's nemesis Abd el-Kadr was indeed on Djemal Pasha's payroll (385). Aaronsohn provides a window not only into nascent Zionism, but his contacts with Djemal allow readers to appreciate the actions of Turkey's government. But Anderson treats them superficially; they appear irregularly through the narrative, without making strong impressions. By default, Lawrence becomes the central figure.<br />
<br />
Anderson's is primarily a disillusioned imperialist. He starts the book with Lawrence refusing the VC from King George V and follows this strand throughout. Lawrence's prewar intelligence work and early years at the Arab Bureau give way to bitter disillusionment. Anderson makes Lawrence's involvement in the Siege of Kut, trying to negotiate the ransom of General Townshend's besieged garrison, a turning point in Lawrence's worldview. Along with his Cairo experiences, Kut taught Lawrence to distrust the "toxic fusion of racism and British notions of military superiority" (170) that shaped British attitudes towards Arab and Turk alike.<br />
<br />
Anderson views Lawrence as not only cynical towards his government, but actively siding with the Arabs. Lawrence not only opposes landing troops in Alexandretta and informs Feisal of Sykes-Picot but, in Anderson's view, encourages his March 1918 negotiations with Mehmet Djemal. Apparently Lawrence saw the negotiations "as a powerful potential weapon to use against his government" (447). Anderson views this as a reaction to Mark Sykes' devious diplomacy ("[he] had a very hard time keeping his facts, even his own beliefs, straight" (155)) and French Colonel Bremond's brusque arrogance. This tallies also with Lawrence's habit of cavalierly disregarding orders. <br />
<br />
Post-Aqaba, Lawrence relished throwing his weight around, spiting not only officers like Cyril Wilson he disliked but "pushing aside" his friend Stewart Newcombe (352). Anderson thoroughly plumbs Lawrence's relationship with Emir Faisal: he respects the chieftain's "unshaken ambition" (246) but grows wary at his "propensity for vacillation" (289). Where Korda recounts Lawrence's postwar meetings with Feisal as happy occasions, Anderson shows them as "awkward gatherings" (504). Not an overt "debunking" work, it's surely the most cynical treatment of Lawrence since Michael Asher. <br />
<br />
Anderson isn't entirely convincing. Lawrence's disgust at Allied perfidy is evident throughout his writings; it's hard to credit authors like <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2010/12/te-lawrence-arab-view-1962-suleiman.html">Suleiman Mousa</a> and <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2010/12/secret-lives-of-lawrence-of-arabia.html">Phillip Knightley</a> who strenuously argue him a heartless imperialist. But extreme suppositions that Lawrence engendered Feisal's negotiations with the Turks build on decidedly slender foundations. Anderson isn't wrong to that Lawrence's efforts during the Arab Revolt, and later at Versailles, left him drained and ashamed. Yet later, Lawrence felt his efforts at 1922's Cairo Conference squared his loyalty to Britain and the Arabs adequately.<br />
<br />
Nor does Anderson particularly shine elsewhere. His accounts of Lawrence's military actions read fairly, but without particular insight or originality. He's less interested in Lawrence's tactics than his growing "hatred for the enemy" which culminates in Tafas (416). He dismisses <i>Seven Pillars of Wisdom</i> as a "fabulously uneven book" (504). Lawrence's later life, in Anderson's view, is "decidedly prosaic" (504) and hence largely ignored. The Lawrence lauded for his "genius for friendship," able to charm both
aristocrats and army privates, appears nowhere in these pages. Any hints of insouciant humor drown beneath waves of bitterness.<br />
<br />
Anderson sniffs at "arcane squabbles between those seeking to tarnish his reputation and those seeking to defend it" (3), yet can't help examining a few himself. He confirms Barr's assertion that the northern ride during the Aqaba expedition is beyond dispute (322). He reasonably questions Lawrence's account of Deraa but concludes that "<i>something</i> happened in Deraa" (401). His "something" is a recapitulation of Richard Aldington's theory that Lawrence willingly submitted to the Bey's advances (402).<br />
<br />
<br />
One shouldn't begrudge Scott Anderson for a well-written book. History buffs can learn a good deal, and even jaded Lawrence snobs may find it an engaging read. It's just a shame that Anderson offers little substantive insight into his central figure.Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-29410474039039182682013-08-21T21:38:00.002-07:002013-08-21T21:38:41.156-07:00Checking inIt's been over four months since my last post. Groggy's recently moved and started a new job, so not a lot of time for Lawrence research.<br />
<br />
One obvious point of interest: the recent release of Scott Anderson's<i> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Lawrence-Arabia-Deceit-Imperial-Making/dp/038553292X/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1377145780&sr=1-2&keywords=te+lawrence+biography">Lawrence in Arabia: War, Deceit, Imperial Folly and the Making of the Modern Middle East</a></i>. The reviews are positively hyperbolic, yet little I've culled from more detailed pieces (cf. <a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/arts/books/2013/08/16/book-review-lawrence-arabia-scott-anderson/rDeXzn7opZQ3QDvDEWEqAL/story.html">here</a>) suggests there's anything not covered by myriad other Lawrence books, or broader studies like David Fromkin's <i>A Peace to End All Peace</i>. The only new wrinkle seems to be profiling Lawrence alongside contemporaries like Aaronsohn (already juxtaposed with TEL by Ronald Florence), Curt Prufer and William Yale.<br />
<br />
<br />
Does this mean I won't read Anderson's book? Of course not. I'm always excited to read a new Lawrence tome, and will jump on this as soon as time and money allow. I'm just amused that the same old claims get trotted out by every biography coming down the pike. Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-70506873076805770082013-03-15T16:29:00.000-07:002013-03-15T16:29:05.289-07:00Upcoming Lawrence Biography<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEioaKzNHp66cGnvX539w_E7OwLsNC_uiF1sMa0A2FPQ0xVV8T8DBEGRmr79VxgIK1nTyBkTBcr9lHano67TSIcKITWU7Q3hAxmkud0yRH7I1ME7D_AS0EiRqsjE4diutypbcHLtHEhfr_G1/s1600/Warrior+and+Scholar.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEioaKzNHp66cGnvX539w_E7OwLsNC_uiF1sMa0A2FPQ0xVV8T8DBEGRmr79VxgIK1nTyBkTBcr9lHano67TSIcKITWU7Q3hAxmkud0yRH7I1ME7D_AS0EiRqsjE4diutypbcHLtHEhfr_G1/s1600/Warrior+and+Scholar.jpg" /></a></div>
May sees the release of a new volume on TEL: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/LAWRENCE-Warrior-Scholar-Bruce-Leigh/dp/0954311574/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1363389832&sr=1-1&keywords=lawrence+warrior+and+scholar"><i>Lawrence: Warrior and Scholar</i></a> by Bruce Leigh.<br />
<br />
This book is a slim (120 pp.) volume published by <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&ved=0CE0QFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thetatteredflag.com%2F&ei=pq5DUa6JBJLG4APiv4HYCA&usg=AFQjCNHRgUfrSY3glhv06kfajODwURDsSw&bvm=bv.43828540,d.dmg">Tattered Flag</a>, an independent publisher of military history. Its Amazon blurb makes some rather bold claims, to wit:<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"Nobody has gone in search of the mind of the man himself - of his
formation and his deep beliefs. Nobody has asked the question, What,
really, is the source of the extraordinary power of this little man?"</blockquote>
<br />
I leave it to my readers to judge the truthfulness of this comment. Suffice it to say this sensationalist, preening ad copy gets more tiresome with each new book. Still, let's wish Mr. Leigh the best of luck - and hope his book is a worthy addition to the Lawrence canon.Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com7tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-49682436386758792662013-02-24T09:04:00.000-08:002013-02-24T18:31:05.761-08:00Hannen Swaffer Vs. TEL<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5I0j3Gj8w5-1-JGhgCIDAmWNKOiIXIvdJoHQq_IDg_RhzkXrYz-BPGRl_fstX59hUqTTDeK_CkjM3WgDeOvraT_ptH7o7Qke2VvXIBpC3NGyNuLhW8BscV_oGyg6vVXmXRJFfQuci-Nwd/s1600/Hannen+Swaffer.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg5I0j3Gj8w5-1-JGhgCIDAmWNKOiIXIvdJoHQq_IDg_RhzkXrYz-BPGRl_fstX59hUqTTDeK_CkjM3WgDeOvraT_ptH7o7Qke2VvXIBpC3NGyNuLhW8BscV_oGyg6vVXmXRJFfQuci-Nwd/s320/Hannen+Swaffer.jpg" width="231" /></a></div>
Maarten Schild points me towards an article published in the April 22, 1933 <i>Literary Digest</i>. Entitled "<a href="http://www.oldmagazinearticles.com/TE_Lawrence_magazine_articles_pdf">Debunking Lawrence of Arabia</a>," it's a sarcastic open letter questioning Lawrence's modesty and achievements, penned by famed British journalist Hannen Swaffer.<br />
<br />
The letter itself offers no substantive criticism, merely a rant against Lawrence's inflated (in Swaffer's view) reputation. "This sort of hero worship is a public menace," Swaffer writes, condemning Lawrence's self-contradiction and ceaseless press coverage. Yet it's an interesting piece, if only as an example of early Lawrence criticism, long before Richard Aldington's <i>Biographical Enquiry</i>.<br />
<br />
Skepticism towards Lawrence did not originate with Aldington. Indian officers serving in Mesopotamia, including Arnold Wilson and Charles Vickery resented the attention drawn to Lawrence's theater of operations. Major N.N. Bray published<i> Shifting Sands</i> in 1928, criticizing Lawrence and the Arab Bureau for supporting the Hashemites over Ibn Saud. Lawrence's French counterpart Edmond Bremond was unflattering in his <i><i>Le Hedjaz dans la guerre mondiale</i></i> (1931). Charles Wilson, wartime British resident in Jeddah, excoriated Lawrence in a review of Lowell Thomas's <i>With Lawrence in Arabia</i> (1924). Schild <a href="http://www.maartenschild.com/lawrence/?p=312">notes</a> also that these critics helped originate claims of Lawrence's homosexuality. Many had personal reasons to attack Lawrence, yet their positions gave them perceived credibility. <br />
<br />
Intellectuals and writers shared their reservations. Explorer <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=bdm8AAAAIAAJ&dq=lowell+thomas+with+lawrence+in+arabia&q=figment#search_anchor">Rosita Forbes</a> attacked Lawrence as "a figment of [Lowell Thomas's] imagination." Poet <a href="http://www.vqronline.org/articles/1990/autumn/meyers-lawrence-unveiled/">Herbert Read</a>, incidentally a friend of Aldington, called <i>Seven Pillars of Wisdom</i> an "expensive parade of eccentricity and bad taste" and the author a near-psychopath in a 1928 article for <span class="st"><i>The Bibliophiles' Almanack</i></span>. Historian George Antonius accused Lawrence of self-promotion in <i>The Arab Awakening</i> (1938). Even D.H. Lawrence took a few shots in <a href="http://classiclit.about.com/library/bl-etexts/dhlawrence/bl-dhlaw-lady-18.htm"><i>Lady Chatterley's Lover</i></a>, ridiculing Colonel "C.E. Florence" for his "unsatisfactory mysticism... [Sir Malcolm] saw too much advertisement behind all the humility."<br />
<br />
Swaffer's critique illustrates that Aldington did not exist in a vacuum. Many publicly and privately found Lawrence failed to measure up to the Lowell Thomas media circus. Some outright loathed him. Yet until 1955, they were a footnote compared to the popular biographies of Thomas, Robert Graves, Liddell Hart, the praise of well-connected friends Winston Churchill and Bernard Shaw, and Lawrence's own remarkable writings.Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-84827279584948111402013-02-22T20:10:00.002-08:002013-02-22T20:23:15.473-08:00T.E. Lawrence in Arabia and After (1934, B.H. Liddell Hart)<div style="text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhzyxPc4sSJ3nDGXBuAzG5xpeR6WMDgdnzf012RNIBS8SJt5-F7Vj8rzU8Fq_MtLVkK3QiEcDCerT16wGfD7_hhiQVPeK-A2Cc2yv1teDxqGstYzDIUS0MKuXZzG5fRkXU_E6NJLNs3GVL0/s1600/BHLH+Book.jpg" imageanchor="1"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhzyxPc4sSJ3nDGXBuAzG5xpeR6WMDgdnzf012RNIBS8SJt5-F7Vj8rzU8Fq_MtLVkK3QiEcDCerT16wGfD7_hhiQVPeK-A2Cc2yv1teDxqGstYzDIUS0MKuXZzG5fRkXU_E6NJLNs3GVL0/s320/BHLH+Book.jpg" /> </a></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b>Publishing Info:</b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Liddell Hart, Basil H. <i>Lawrence of Arabia</i>. New York: Da Capo Press, Inc., 1989. 406 pp. </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Originally published as <i>T.E. Lawrence in Arabia and After</i>. London: Jonathan Cape, 1934. US publication: <i>Colonel Lawrence: The Man Behind the Legend</i>. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company, 1934.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b>Introduction:</b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Many consider <i>T.E. Lawrence in Arabia and After</i> the first "serious" Lawrence biography after the sensationalism of Lowell Thomas and <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2010/12/lawrence-and-arabian-adventure-aka.html">Robert Graves</a>. Written by England's foremost military theorist, it provides valuable insight into Lawrence's achievements as a strategist "who had the vision to anticipate the guerrilla trend of civilized warfare" (382). Despite his sober bearings, Liddell Hart proves no less susceptible to hero worship than his predecessors.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b>The Author:</b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiN8_N2Gp7D8rrsDvP0h4b3VobPMh3JajFbz9i6CTL_4U8BTyAiP-m6JUPI83Xhc8XBwNS7uThacwpXxgrgnTzB82ZKhfqnNTZw5lmTEeCkFp4LJQmY1Vz6Yvq2cg25RRy0PSbuoGiMhJP8/s1600/BLHL.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiN8_N2Gp7D8rrsDvP0h4b3VobPMh3JajFbz9i6CTL_4U8BTyAiP-m6JUPI83Xhc8XBwNS7uThacwpXxgrgnTzB82ZKhfqnNTZw5lmTEeCkFp4LJQmY1Vz6Yvq2cg25RRy0PSbuoGiMhJP8/s1600/BLHL.jpg" /></a></div>
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Captain Sir Basil Henry Liddell Hart (1895-1970) was an influential writer of military history and tactics. Among his many works are <i>The Strategy of Indirect Approach </i>(1929); biographies of Scipio Africanus, Napoleon, William T. Sherman and Ferdinand Foch; edited <i>The Rommel Papers</i>; and one-volume histories of the First and Second World Wars. His writings on the "indirect approach" to warfare, emphasizing maneuver, concentrated firepower and tanks, provided an intellectual model for Germany's <i>blitzkrieg</i> tactics during the Second World War. </div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<b>The Review: </b></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
The balance of Liddell Hart's book analyzes Lawrence's military campaigns. Liddell Hart views Lawrence as a brilliant leader, worthy of comparison to "great captains" like Clausewitz, Napoleon and Marlborough. Using minimal resources against a numerically and technologically superior foe, Lawrence "turn(ed) the weakness of the Arabs into an asset, and the strength of the Turks into a debit" (383).</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Liddell Hart draws uncritically on Lawrence's writings, often to the point of paraphrase. But his strategic and tactical analysis frequently proves unassailable. Consider his analysis of Lawrence's most famous military achievement: (pp. 166-167)<br />
<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
Tactically, the Aqaba operation had inflicted a permanent loss of some 1,200 men... on the Turks - at a cost of two men killed in the conquering force... By the strictest canons of orthodox strategy... it was an unrivaled achievement. The British forces in trying unsuccessfully to capture Gaza [under Murray]... had only succeeded in killing or capturing 1,700 Turks at a permanent cost to themselves of 3,000 men... They had sacrificed roughly two men to kill one Turk, the same number that the Arabs sacrificed to kill 1,200 Turks!</blockquote>
</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Liddell Hart broods on Lawrence's interlude at Wadi Ais, one of <i>Seven Pillars</i>' more dubious (though beautifully written) passages. Liddell Hart takes it at face value, marveling at Lawrence formulating "a new theory of irregular warfare" (138) while racked with fever. He emphasizes Lawrence's campaign against the Hejaz Railway, but downplays the Royal Navy's decisive role in capturing Wejh. He views Lawrence's ephemeral victory at Tafileh as a "gem" (215), while skimming over his failed 1918 Dead Sea
Campaign. The Arabs become a feverish mass, indecisive until Lawrence prods them into action.<br />
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Liddell Hart's analysis deserves qualification. In 1929 he wrote <a href="http://archive.org/stream/strategyofindire035126mbp/strategyofindire035126mbp_djvu.txt"><i>The Strategy of Indirect Approach</i></a>, thanking "T.E.S." in the foreword and dissecting the Arab Revolt. In another book (<i>Great Captains Unveiled</i>, 1927) he highlights Lord Allenby as a great modern general. Later in life Liddell Hart headed the so-called "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Richard-Aldington-Lawrence-Arabia-Cautionary/dp/0809321661/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1361592362&sr=1-1&keywords=lawrence+of+arabia+richard+aldington">Lawrence Bureau</a>," ferociously defending Lawrence's reputation against <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2010/12/lawrence-of-arabia-biographical-enquiry.html">Richard Aldington</a>, <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2012/10/lawrence-of-arabia-seven-scenes-from.html">David Lean</a> and others. (He did collaborate with Terence Rattigan on his play <a href="http://nothingiswrittenfilm.blogspot.com/2012/10/another-lawrence-terence-rattigans-ross.html"><i>Ross: A Dramatic Portrait</i></a> (1960).) Along with his disparagement of Great War leadership, Liddell Hart clearly views Lawrence as exemplifying his pet theories. <br />
<br />
For all that, Liddell Hart's overall assessment is shrewd. It's possible to overstate Lawrence's tactical achievements, but he undeniably influenced military theory: guerrilla leaders from Orde Wingate to Vo Nguyen Giap drew inspiration from <i>Seven Pillars</i>, while American troops in Afghanistan and Iraq study Lawrence's <a href="http://wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/The_27_Articles_of_T.E._Lawrence">27 Articles</a>. Those scoffing at the small number of Arabs joining King Hussein's revolt miss the point of asymmetrical warfare, so beautifully elucidated by Liddell Hart. For minimal casualties and lucre, the Arab Revolt provided the British an extremely useful sideshow.<br />
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgy0_o1x2OO42RHJaS6PRXLmSyKxJkMnDFy0x-JBPV51F5N001O_13hqJ0Ms2PF8_28IboHb6hAPUj7l8QuH5qHtPNPmRWzvMauzF8EmG1jadJ8ms6RJ-6JL0jb3685kz1ZG9P7OzIMsRMm/s1600/Liddell+Hart+TE.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgy0_o1x2OO42RHJaS6PRXLmSyKxJkMnDFy0x-JBPV51F5N001O_13hqJ0Ms2PF8_28IboHb6hAPUj7l8QuH5qHtPNPmRWzvMauzF8EmG1jadJ8ms6RJ-6JL0jb3685kz1ZG9P7OzIMsRMm/s320/Liddell+Hart+TE.jpg" width="319" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><b>Liddell Hart (right) with TEL at Hythe, ca. 1934</b>.</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
Liddell Hart proves less shrewd otherwise analyzing his subject. He seems just as credulous to Lawrence's tall tales and evasions as Thomas or Graves. He sketches Lawrence's early years thinly, omitting Lawrence's illegitimacy or tense relationship with his mother. Even this early in Lawrence literature, inconsistencies emerge. For one, Lawrence's pre-war ambush by a Syrian bandit (9) differs significantly from Graves: in this telling, Lawrence thwarts the bandit by dissembling his pistol. More notably, Liddell Hart downplays Lawrence's complicity in the Tafas Massacre (287-288), when Lawrence himself is shockingly forthright.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
Liddell Hart notes Lawrence's artistic interests, highlighting his "process of swift mental appreciation" (12), "extraordinary charm" (13) and "ha[ving] an instinctive shyness born of a sense of difference" (258). He relates amusing anecdotes like Lawrence's confronting an imposter: "Had he stuck to his statement I should have begun to question myself," says his subject (369). There's also his passage on Lawrence's postwar military service, finding "a sense of fulfillment, reinforced by a sense of futility" in being a gentleman ranker (330), and proving rare in 'adjusting his opinions to his knowledge" (375). These passages provide valuable insight into Lawrence's personality. <br />
<br />
But Liddell Hart's views of Lawrence often prove simplistic or worse. The author's "reasoned belief in the benefits of British administration" (309) distorts Lawrence's efforts at Paris and Cairo to reconcile British, French and Arab war aims. Nor can we credit his view of Lawrence as a "Crusader" (374), a melodramatic flash out of Lowell Thomas. When all else fails, Liddell Hart falls back on starry-eyed hagiography. He melodramatically ends by announcing that "in [Lawrence] the Spirit of Freedom came incarnate to a world in fetters" (390), a messiah cut down in his prime.</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
It's perhaps unfair to conclude, like Stephen Tabachnick, that Liddell Hart views "Lawrence as a potential dictator" (<a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2010/12/images-of-lawrence-1988-stephen-e.html"><i>Images of Lawrence</i></a>, 40). Liddell Hart discussed the idea with Lawrence but both seem to view it as a lark. It <u>was</u> proposed seriously by novelist Henry Williamson, who imagined Lawrence leading "a whirlwind campaign which would end the fearful thought of old Europe" (<a href="http://archive.org/details/GeniusOfFriendship"><i>Genius of Friendship</i></a>, 75). Lawrence also complained of being approached by Oswald Mosley's Blackshirts, repeatedly rebuffing them. "I don't want to be considered... as a philosophic system, or a paragon... of conduct," he told Graves.<br />
<br />
Rather, Liddell Hart seems profoundly awed by Lawrence, a common reaction among friends. Winston Churchill proclaimed Lawrence "one of the greatest beings alive in our time." Vyvyan Richards compared him to Alexander the Great <u>and</u> St. Francis of Assisi; Williamson to Jesus Christ. All of them, not unreasonably, thought Lawrence an extraordinary man with a calling greater than RAF anonymity. Perhaps there lies the true measure of Lawrence's greatness: not his military genius or literary skill, but his ability to befriend and bewitch such a diverse lot of people. <br />
<br />
Even this benign reading points up <i>T.E. Lawrence in Arabia and After</i>'s primary shortcoming. Liddell Hart the historian can scrutinize Lawrence's campaigns with clarity and insight. But Liddell Hart the man can't see Lawrence as anything but a friend, seemingly lacking guile or fault. The resulting tome merely cocoons the Lawrence myth in a scholarly patina, begging for skeptics to bust it open.</div>
Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-55288512357450002552013-01-30T17:59:00.002-08:002013-02-22T20:24:53.373-08:00Richard Aldington Rides Again: Nick Pope on Lawrence, Aldington and "Legends"<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhV0qIGH9lAweXNZLhlHh_4emSWhixu6MzhM5HS2zeNImJJCmuDIQr06U6I_bjRLWa46s4A3NppNEcy97_YDquQGaz8m1Qt19P0_igX-DT8G4MiDxSmHY1W3o1T5-HRQTdfEafgHRUA78nu/s1600/Aldington.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhV0qIGH9lAweXNZLhlHh_4emSWhixu6MzhM5HS2zeNImJJCmuDIQr06U6I_bjRLWa46s4A3NppNEcy97_YDquQGaz8m1Qt19P0_igX-DT8G4MiDxSmHY1W3o1T5-HRQTdfEafgHRUA78nu/s1600/Aldington.jpg" /></a></div>
<a href="http://www.majalla.com/eng/2013/01/article55237636">This piece</a> by Nick Pope appeared in Monday's edition of <i>The Majalla</i>, a magazine focusing on the Arab World. Given the magazine's focus it's not surprising Lawrence comes under fire: Arab writers like Edward Said and <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2010/12/te-lawrence-arab-view-1962-suleiman.html">Suleiman Mousa</a> have long criticized Lawrence, alongside more liberal-minded Westerners. What <u>is</u> strange is that it posits Richard Aldington's 1955 <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2010/12/lawrence-of-arabia-biographical-enquiry.html"><i>Biographical Enquiry</i></a> as "unravel[ing] the hype and fabrication behind the Lawrence story."<br />
<br />
Mr. Pope admits he's "no scholar" in Lawrence studies, yet evinces familiarity with <i>Seven Pillars</i> and other biographies. That said, his read on both Lawrence and Aldington proves annoyingly superficial. This piece reads like the breathless reviews that invariably accompany new Lawrence biographies, boldly intoning again how this book "cuts the Lawrence legend down to size" or "reduces its subject to human scale." <br />
<br />
First, it's wrong to characterize Aldington as "a mere footnote... in the Lawrence legend industry." Anyone vaguely familiar with Lawrence studies knows Aldington's profound impact on public and scholarly discourse. His revelations of Lawrence's illegitimacy and connivance with early biographers, alongside critical analyses of Lawrence's writings and more spurious accusations of homosexuality, pathological lying and egomania, forced future biographers to reassess Lawrence. Certainly they remain prevalent in public consciousness; the film <i><a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2012/10/lawrence-of-arabia-seven-scenes-from.html">Lawrence of Arabia</a> </i>notably incorporates much of Aldington's characterization. For better or worse, Aldington continues to color the Lawrence debate. <br />
<br />
Pope's criticisms of <i>Seven Pillars of Wisdom</i>, drawing on Aldington's book, aren't very convincing either. Note his disparagement of Lawrence claiming Aqaba's capture as "another Gallipoli" (not a direct quote) when "it had been done [by the British] twice before." Yes, by small Royal Navy hit-and-run raids too small to actually hold the town. Anyway, Lawrence's comment occurs when his superiors Murray and Wingate proposed an Anglo-French landing at Aqaba. Having visited the region, Lawrence feared that a massed landing of troops would be<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
as unfavorably placed as on a Gallipoli beach, would be under observation and gun-fire from the coastal hills: and these granite hills, thousands of feet high, were impracticable for heavy troops: the passes through them being formidable defiles, very costly to assault or to cover. (p. 173, 2001 Penguin Classics edition of SP)</blockquote>
<br />
True, the Turks maintained only a small regional garrison at Aqaba, small enough for Royal Marines to periodically come ashore and capture them. But then the Turks had few troops guarding the Dardanelles in early 1915, either. The landing of an entire army would produce a major reaction, with terrain giving the Turks a decided advantage. Hardly a baseless boast by Lawrence but a shrewd tactical assessment.<br />
<br />
It's true that Allenby's British regulars did the lion's share of the fighting in Palestine, with the Arab Revolt a "sideshow." Does Lawrence claim otherwise? He consciously admitted to writing a subjective account of his personal experiences serving with the Arabs. Nor was Lawrence's oft-stated distrust of French imperial designs - harped on incessantly by Aldington - remotely unique among British policymakers of that era, as David Fromkin and <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2012/07/setting-desert-on-fire-te-lawrence-and.html">James Barr</a> have shown.<br />
<br />
But then Aldington's whole book harps on minor points. When Lawrence dismissively refers to Bulgaria's surrender as "insignificant to us" (SP 649) during a raid, Aldington thinks it "a degree of more than usual egotism" (240) to downplay such a momentous event. To Lawrence's Bedouin campaigning in the desert though, the news probably <u>didn't</u> matter. Deflating the claim that Lawrence read 50,000 books at Oxford (31-32) is amusing but pointless: surely this was playful exaggeration rather than a psychotic lie. If <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2010/12/lawrence-and-arabian-adventure-aka.html">Robert Graves</a> reported it uncritically the fault doesn't lie with Lawrence.<br />
<br />
This sarcastic pedantry characterizes Aldington's entire work, finding fault with Lawrence even where there's none to be had. Aldington may have started with "no particular feelings towards Lawrence" but his writings drip with contempt towards the British establishment that lionized T.E. Certainly he loathes that Lawrence won fame instead of "the real heroes of 1914-1918" (381) - Western Front veterans like himself. Not for nothing did <a href="http://www.lrb.co.uk/v21/n04/robert-irwin/top-grumpys-top-hate">Robert Irwin</a> compare Aldington's book to "a waterfall of venom." <br />
<br />
My main complaint though comes in positioning Aldington as the Rosetta Stone to Lawrence. Pope mentions <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2011/04/prince-of-our-disorder-life-of-te.html">John Mack</a> and <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2012/08/hero-life-and-legend-of-lawrence-of.html">Michael Korda</a>'s books but dismisses them as hero worship, marking the authors as dupes or worse. All the revelations of the post-Aldington era - the release of War Office documents in 1969, witnesses like John Bruce and Janet Laurie, Jeremy Wilson's authorized biography and publishing of Lawrence's private papers - go unmentioned. By ignoring this, Pope strangely undercuts Aldington's importance.<br />
<br />
Finally, there's the implied dichotomy between Lawrence worship and Lawrence hatred. Granted, Aldington was savaged in his time by the "Lawrence Bureau," with A.W. Lawrence and Basil Liddell Hart (whose book I'll soon review) trying to suppress and smear his work. And authorized biographer <a href="http://blog.castlehillpress.com/chpblog/">Jeremy Wilson</a> can be viciously defensive towards Lawrence. That doesn't mean a nuanced view of Lawrence isn't possible. Some people can square Lawrence's disreputable side with his achievements and still find him admirable. Lawrence wasn't a mythic construct, but a human being - more interesting than either Aldington or Liddell Hart would have us believe. Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-31692761617011206662012-10-08T18:39:00.001-07:002012-10-08T18:40:05.906-07:00Lawrence of Arabia: Seven Scenes From Seven Pillars of Wisdom<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKw2DI3-f9MYmTepHFblcNw8ypl2fFwfsnWByNRzy16yxYyC1UT2YZdvbKg-29j7mLlnxGXU3eruvhcLXYidQEJ_hs_WjxxXE5JVMkwhYtrfPToDv9yJf_Hh3f9fcpIvJlOCQ3V12Bxxw/s1600/Lawrence+Camel.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKw2DI3-f9MYmTepHFblcNw8ypl2fFwfsnWByNRzy16yxYyC1UT2YZdvbKg-29j7mLlnxGXU3eruvhcLXYidQEJ_hs_WjxxXE5JVMkwhYtrfPToDv9yJf_Hh3f9fcpIvJlOCQ3V12Bxxw/s320/Lawrence+Camel.png" width="289" /></a></div>
<i>Originally posted <a href="http://nothingiswrittenfilm.blogspot.com/2012/09/lawrence-of-arabia-seven-scenes-from.html">here</a>.</i><br />
<br />
As preparation for seeing David Lean's film <i>Lawrence of Arabia</i> in theaters last week, I re-read T.E. Lawrence's memoir <i>Seven Pillars of Wisdom</i> (London: Penguin Classics edition, 2000). Whatever its strict accuracy (and one must allow for embellishment and subjectivity in memoirs), it's an engrossing read on several levels: as literature, a military chronicle, an exotic travelogue, a political analysis, a psychological self-portrait. It's easy to understand how David Lean saw potential for an exciting film. But how does the movie compare to its source material? <br />
<br />
Rather than an excruciating line-by-line analysis (see <a href="http://www.telstudies.org/discussion/film_tv_radio/lofa_or_sid_1.shtml">Jeremy Wilson</a>), this article examines seven key scenes from <i>Lawrence of Arabia</i> based on their relationship to <i>Seven Pillars</i>. We'll view the filmmakers' choices through three general criteria: 1. How does the scene draw from Lawrence's writings? 2. Is it accurate or at least within the bounds of reasonable dramatic license? 3. What dramatic purposes do any changes serve?<br />
<br />
<b>1. Ali at the Well </b><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjOPtDiVTnezd1Wsaim9GMXpwLZb5ZGjticOPSjHQOcubmzUOpsr9hkxVHNzq9p2fk7atX1WMakXQyD5wTX5yC0p3dJmZUcPdByvIf3zeCDSaZylhn7qZx82YskLtubuLs-CzHYYhiEX4aK/s1600/Matsurah+Well.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="163" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjOPtDiVTnezd1Wsaim9GMXpwLZb5ZGjticOPSjHQOcubmzUOpsr9hkxVHNzq9p2fk7atX1WMakXQyD5wTX5yC0p3dJmZUcPdByvIf3zeCDSaZylhn7qZx82YskLtubuLs-CzHYYhiEX4aK/s320/Matsurah+Well.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
Perhaps Lawrence's most memorable scene is Sherif Ali's introduction at Matsurah Well: a black blob appearing on the horizon and slowly approaching, Lawrence and his guide Tafas watching in trepidation. He shoots Tafas, member of the rival Beni Salem tribe; Ali is a Harith, their blood enemy. Ali takes Lawrence's service pistol, previously gifted to Tafas. Lawrence then denounces Ali as a murderer and continues his journey to Feisal alone.<br />
<br />
This scene draws on an incident in <i>Seven Pillars</i>, but the two depictions couldn't be more different. The real Sherif Ali traveled with a slave, and the two switched identities to fool Tafas. Lawrence treats the incident comically, far from the movie's deadly encounter. Lawrence also shows that Bedouin allowed common use of desert wells, even among unfriendly tribes. Here, Lean readily jettisons reality for artistic effect.<br />
<br />
Lean introduces several thematic strands. It establishes Ali and his bipolar relationship with Lawrence. Lawrence starts as civilized man disgusted by the "savage" Ali; the two develop inversely throughout the film, reversing roles in the final act. The idea of Arabs torn "tribe against tribe," and Lawrence's efforts to unite them for a common cause, is dramatically established. Regardless of realism, the scene is both artistically impressive and dramatically important. <br />
<br />
<b>2. Feisal's Tent </b><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgHUyOa0TNDuJpgc8iSXb0UXWN4Z5Agc73zv2CIgbDhmh8a6N1oUsDJpKMA9fa3717OIKgzFtlsUaj00Sl57g1NGWoeITvJTFUN8S9A55_C7x6iyBFsblhj1C0xvjiG9BhXTs5LEaflfCV4/s1600/Lawrence+Feisal.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="140" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgHUyOa0TNDuJpgc8iSXb0UXWN4Z5Agc73zv2CIgbDhmh8a6N1oUsDJpKMA9fa3717OIKgzFtlsUaj00Sl57g1NGWoeITvJTFUN8S9A55_C7x6iyBFsblhj1C0xvjiG9BhXTs5LEaflfCV4/s320/Lawrence+Feisal.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
From his first meeting with Prince Feisal, Lawrence felt him "the leader who would bring the Arab Revolt to full glory" (92). As portrayed by Alec Guinness, Feisal embodies Arabia's glorious past and dreams of independence, with a shade of worldly cynicism. He has no illusions about British war aims and ultimately accepts an unfavorable compromise.<br />
<br />
Lean and writer Robert Bolt draw loosely on <i>Seven Pillars</i> but use this encounter as a dramatic springboard. Obviously it's an important scene for Lawrence and the other characters. It's also crucial in delineating themes and plot devices that will recur throughout the film.<br />
<br />
Lean introduces Colonel Brighton, a composite character representing military convention. Brighton emphasizes the importance of discipline, disputed by Ali (who wants modern weapons) and Feisal (who doubts its value). Lawrence immediately (and inaccurately) disagrees with Brighton and advocate a third way: guerrilla warfare. This piques Feisal's interest, allowing him to confide his fears to Lawrence that the English "hunger for Arabia."<br />
<br />
In the subsequent "miracle" scene (drawing loosely on Lawrence's interlude at Wadi Ais), Lawrence realizes the Arabs must move north and seize Aqaba to regain the initiative. This is misleading. Contrary to Brighton's claim that the Royal Navy has "better things to do," they worked closely with the Arabs in seizing the port of Wejh (January 1917). After this, Lawrence says in <i>Seven Pillars</i>, "the Arab movement... had passed beyond danger of collapse" (169). Aqaba was not then a desperate gambit but a logical next step.<br />
<br />
Dramatically, this scene places Arab and British war aims in opposition. The Arabs want complete independence; the British want to limit the uprising, in furtherance of imperial goals. Lawrence must choose one side or the other, or else be hopelessly conflicted. There's much truth to this characterization, though oddly Lean makes Lawrence ignorant of the Sykes-Picot Agreement until much later! This scene is dubious historically but provides a solid basis for further drama.<br />
<br />
<b>3. Gassim: Nothing is Written </b><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhzw73IXKsMTDnCoCbhPVSrqj0NZHlhstBH70lWRT5_ur3swSmiCEN5bEdH1QZbCeJJUWaK2-eVThZeDYAnWawTrOMPUi5M4oItWjifjPeINxqaH0wqFHwuUkj_aSe6jYXPEfrFwrhF0xVn/s1600/Gassim.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="161" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhzw73IXKsMTDnCoCbhPVSrqj0NZHlhstBH70lWRT5_ur3swSmiCEN5bEdH1QZbCeJJUWaK2-eVThZeDYAnWawTrOMPUi5M4oItWjifjPeINxqaH0wqFHwuUkj_aSe6jYXPEfrFwrhF0xVn/s320/Gassim.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
One of <i>Lawrence</i>'s best scenes is the rescue of Gassim, an Arab tribesman lost on the road to Aqaba. This sequence, strikingly shot by Lean, closely follows <i>Seven Pillars</i>' description (260-264). Shortly afterwards Lawrence eschews his uniform for white robes, the Arabs accepting him as "El Aurens" - the cornerstone of his legend. Here Lean deviates from <i>Seven Pillars</i>: Auda abu Tayi (who in reality joined the Aqaba expedition at its onset) wonders why Lawrence risked his life for a man "not worth a camel's price" (263), while Lawrence had been wearing Arab robes long before.<br />
<br />
Dramatically this scene serves two major purposes. First, as mentioned, it marks Lawrence's acceptance by the Arabs, especially Ali, who soon becomes an inseparable friend. Second, it highlights Lawrence's first triumph over Fate. Ignoring Arab fatalism, Lawrence proves he can overcome long odds through determination: "Nothing is written!" This minor triumph sets the stage for greater victories at Aqaba and Damascus.<br />
<br />
Lean later provides an ironic coda when Lawrence executes Gassim for murdering a Howeitat (tellingly, with Tafas's revolver). "It was written then," intones Auda, reasserting Fate's power over Choice. It also introduces a new theme - Lawrence's enjoyment of killing. The real Lawrence executed another Arab, Hamed, for a similar crime earlier in<i> Seven Pillars</i>. Conflating the two events is acceptable dramatic license.<br />
<br />
<b>4. Meeting Allenby </b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi4Mu7TFBebV8KCd-UVneQAQdX27yFXaDqyxqvees8gtsD8VH3utyB2mbsVtalqye_pIW2A_vUMLhaosZlLtP9vkPMomuORjy7oZuqmG0xkuRcId85sV9SXtG89wfpkWhCL8iwkelQCNy7S/s1600/Lawrence+Allenby+Meeting.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="168" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi4Mu7TFBebV8KCd-UVneQAQdX27yFXaDqyxqvees8gtsD8VH3utyB2mbsVtalqye_pIW2A_vUMLhaosZlLtP9vkPMomuORjy7oZuqmG0xkuRcId85sV9SXtG89wfpkWhCL8iwkelQCNy7S/s320/Lawrence+Allenby+Meeting.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
Lawrence spends a single page detailing his first encounter with General Edmund Allenby. He enthuses about his new commander, "physically large and confident" (330) and more willing to help the Revolt than his predecessor General Murray. Lawrence's admiration for Allenby, both man and military commander, is clear throughout <i>Seven Pillars</i>, even describing him as a father figure. <br />
<br />
Lean transforms this "comic interview" into one of the film's pivotal sequences. Lasting nearly 15 minutes, it serves a myriad of functions. Bolt elucidates Aqaba's strategic importance, quoting Lawrence's arguments in <i>Seven Pillars</i> (cf. 281). The British officers who, just a scene before, inundated Lawrence with racial slurs now cheer him as a hero. Besides introducing Allenby and developing Brighton (who gains genuine admiration for Lawrence), it probes Lawrence's psyche at a key moment in the narrative.<br />
<br />
Lawrence comes across as a broken, neurotic wreck. His pride in capturing Aqaba has dissipated, after losing his servant Daud to quicksand and his encounter with racist officers. Worse, Lawrence realizes his own blood lust, "enjoying" his execution of Gassim and fearing its future implications. Exhausted and afraid he desperately begs for reassignment. He has the bad luck of meeting Allenby, here not a supportive superior with "confidence... like a wall" (553) but a deceitful villain.<br />
<br />
Where Murray dismissed Lawrence as "the kind of creature I can't stand," Allenby immediately recognizes Lawrence's military value. A guerrilla army harassing Turkish supply lines is a boon for future offensives. He also pegs Lawrence's Achilles heel: vanity. Dismissing Lawrence's concerns, he elicits complements from Brighton (officer), Dryden (civilian) and a Mr. Perkins (enlisted man), covering all bases of flattery. Then he holds a public military conference, expounding Lawrence's genius to his entire staff. Thus Allenby's defining traits: military skill and psychological perfidy.<br />
<br />
Lean and Bolt re-introduce earlier anti-war/imperialist themes. Lawrence suspects Britain won't honor their promises, an inquiry Allenby and Dryden both dodge. The scene ends with Allenby, Brighton and Dryden deciding not to give the Arabs artillery. For now, Lawrence is satiated by vague promises of post-war freedom, and concrete promises of arms and money. His ego flushed by adulation, he returns to the desert.<br />
<br />
<b>5. Deraa Is The Key</b><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEioG6R6DVHFVGr87pT4paBmu4EmQjLDoerZ-IHOqm3iLUxDTPAkH3yfBAwOvH7W2p77KD-AXnSia3bDhQzdg3zY4Rzyidy42o3_UV1VpSTB2zIcK2SKIVFcHRElDA2itVIyQnnku4fCtcHl/s1600/Deraa.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="168" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEioG6R6DVHFVGr87pT4paBmu4EmQjLDoerZ-IHOqm3iLUxDTPAkH3yfBAwOvH7W2p77KD-AXnSia3bDhQzdg3zY4Rzyidy42o3_UV1VpSTB2zIcK2SKIVFcHRElDA2itVIyQnnku4fCtcHl/s320/Deraa.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
Surely the most traumatic incident in <i>Seven Pillars</i> involves Lawrence's capture, torture and gang rape by Turkish soldiers in Deraa in November of 1917. Of course, many historians doubt this incident actually happened, but that debates fall outside this post's scope. Lean and Bolt make it a central scene in <i>Lawrence</i>, but distort both the background and its effects significantly.<br />
<br />
Lawrence's reasons for entering Deraa were banal. Deraa (in present-day Syria) was an important railroad junction which Lawrence hoped to raid. While scouting in town he was arrested by the Turks and taken to a Turkish officer - supposedly Hajim Bey, the garrison commander. The officer "began to fawn on me... (offering to) make me his orderly... if I would love him" (452). Lawrence refused his advances, then was beaten and sexually assaulted by the Bey's soldiers. Lawrence escapes, and later learns that he was betrayed by Syrian nationalist Abd el-Kadr.<br />
<br />
This incident obviously traumatized Lawrence, leaving deep physical and psychological scars. His post-war masochism likely originated with Deraa, and he remained incapable of sexual feelings afterwards. It's easy to overstate its effects, however. In <i>Seven Pillars</i>, Lawrence scarcely refers to the incident again. He's more distraught by a military failure, his continuing guilt over his liaison role and treachery by an Arab colleague. This is what convinced him to "beg Allenby to find me some smaller part elsewhere" (514), not trauma over Deraa.<br />
<br />
Lean's restrained depiction of Lawrence's mistreatment is understandable. But Bolt's portrayal of Lawrence borders on ridiculous. Here, Lawrence and Ali stride into Deraa alone, Lawrence apparently thinking his mere presence will inspire a rising. Aqaba convinced him he can work "miracles," further inflamed by Allenby's flattery and subsequent successes. "Do you think I'm just anybody?" he asks Ali before embarking on his mission. This is utterly ridiculous hubris, and one of the film's weaker moments.<br />
<br />
Bolt thought "Deraa is the key" to all of Lawrence's subsequent actions: his attempted resignation, the massacre at Tafas, his psychological collapse. In this he followed many biographers, who placed undue emphasis on Lawrence's psychosexual side. It seems altogether too convenient an explanation, if dramatically handy for a screenwriter.<br />
<br />
<b>6. Tafas Massacre </b><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjMRoQ-28EvifoFzvmBluEwdVxmMMaL7oBsHz1y2E0ZzjnCdDv5VFEM2Gou3k60gqlvq7oqMS0bzqJAg48gzzOwrHE-HsBEzQvvcSEosZtPXdt4OVsa-1vdl72yAmPia7aBWIdSwiA9Boq/s1600/Tafas+Massacre.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="168" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjMRoQ-28EvifoFzvmBluEwdVxmMMaL7oBsHz1y2E0ZzjnCdDv5VFEM2Gou3k60gqlvq7oqMS0bzqJAg48gzzOwrHE-HsBEzQvvcSEosZtPXdt4OVsa-1vdl72yAmPia7aBWIdSwiA9Boq/s320/Tafas+Massacre.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
<i>Seven Pillars</i> graphically describes the Tafas Massacre, a horrific incident during Allenby's Megiddo offensive. The Arabs brutally slaughter 2,000 Turkish soldiers, many after surrendering, in retaliation for sacking a local village. Some biographers shield Lawrence from responsibility, but Lawrence makes his own culpability explicit: "By my orders we took no prisoners" (653). Lean provides a reasonable dramatization of the event, but delivers a suspect characterization of Lawrence.<br />
<b><br /></b>This scene brings Lawrence's neuroses to a head. Bolt offers a Freudian explanation for Tafas, Lawrence avenging his degradation at Deraa through massacre, now killing gleefully, surrounded by a bodyguard of hired killers. His descent into animal barbarism is contrasted with Ali's increasingly "civilized" behavior; the latter even echoes Lawrence's taunt from their first meeting: "Surely you know the Arabs are a barbarous people!" Lawrence ends the scene blood-soaked and mentally broken, having reached the apotheosis he'd tried to avoid.<br />
<br />
As mentioned previously, Lean and Bolt largely draw on <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2010/04/lawrence-of-arabia-man-and-motive-1961.html">Anthony Nutting's biography of Lawrence</a>. In <i>Seven Pillars</i>, Lawrence largely accepts the carnage as a fact of tribal warfare. The Turks after all precipitated it by murdering Arab civilians, initiating collective anger and brutal vengeance. Soon after the Bedouin captured Deraa and continued towards Damascus. The movie however treats Tafas as a hollow triumph, needless bloodshed born of one man's psychosis.<br />
<br />
<b>7. Damascus and the Arab Council</b><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKZyLdYGqHJagTV0YDQFV6HBpdCHU4UEAzVB_JcsOF9ntUDrV4FkmrY7lf1-Q4DNxuNkEQu1rLuqA0UxDgVnezeAxFJLBPZLfzndlKbY-6iSWmJGqZNG437y1eavrp2lCImHBPubB0XV9G/s1600/Lawrence+Damascus.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="168" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKZyLdYGqHJagTV0YDQFV6HBpdCHU4UEAzVB_JcsOF9ntUDrV4FkmrY7lf1-Q4DNxuNkEQu1rLuqA0UxDgVnezeAxFJLBPZLfzndlKbY-6iSWmJGqZNG437y1eavrp2lCImHBPubB0XV9G/s320/Lawrence+Damascus.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
The worst scenes, historically-speaking, come at film's end. Lean and Bolt's version of post-war Damascus is recognizable only through a few colorful anecdotes gleaned from <i>Seven Pillars</i>. History is far more complex and interesting than what Lean and Bolt offer.<br />
<br />
Lawrence describes raucous scenes in <i>Seven Pillars</i>, the town hall "packed with a swaying mob" (666) and arguing over Damascus's governance. The real threat, however, was neither Sherifian incompetence nor British indifference, but Abd el-Kadr: the same man who'd betrayed Lawrence at Deraa. Kadr and his brothers launched several attempted coups to undermine Feisal's authority, resulting in several skirmishes with Feisal's men. Kadr was eventually killed in November 1918 while imprisoned. The issue, therefore, was not (in Lawrence's account) tribalism but an ambitious man and his followers.<br />
<br />
Far worse is the depiction of the Arabs as utterly incompetent. They appear as rubes baffled by machinery, allowing Damascus to catch fire (really set by Turkish troops) and Turkish wounded to die in hospital. In reality, the Arabs "quickly collected the nucleus of a staff and plunged ahead as a team" (671), creating a police force, fire brigades, mechanics and sanitation committees. The movie recounts Lawrence's encounter with an enraged British medical officer ("This is outrageous!"), focusing on its irony: after a movie of searching for his identity, Lawrence is mistaken for an Arab. What a time to highlight this!<br />
<br />
Lawrence's narrative ends with him exiting Damascus, as does the movie. The situation left behind however is quite different. Feisal's government remained in power until 1921, when France ousted them at bayonet point. No conniver in Allied perfidy, Feisal fought the French tooth-and-nail before being placed as a contentious client on Iraq's throne. Allenby seemed genuinely to regret his role, doing his best to balance British, French and Arab interests as ordered. Neither man is fairly characterized here.<br />
<br />
This anti-climax logically concludes the movie's anti-war themes and recurring hubris. Again, a major victory can't come without an offsetting failure, and bloodshed must amount to nothing. Perhaps we're to draw inferences about modern pan-Arabism; Nasser's United Arab Republic collapsed while the film was in production. Regardless, this scene is not only inaccurate but insulting, as this ostensibly anti-imperial film falls back on "White Man's burden" stereotypes. Here's one instance where the dramatic license proves genuinely regrettable.<br />
<br />
<b>Conclusion</b><br />
<br />
Like all historical and literary adaptations, <i>Lawrence of Arabia</i> often sacrifices accuracy for artistic effect. In many cases it's justifiable or transcends the source. In several instances, however, it's highly questionable or even deleterious. Still, even the highly questionable scenes listed have some basis in<i> Seven Pillars of Wisdom</i>. As an adaptation, <i>Lawrence</i> is probably no better or worse than Hollywood's usual efforts.Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-69351046186027161282012-09-25T16:06:00.001-07:002012-09-25T16:06:27.644-07:00New Maarten Schild postMaarten Schild has a fascinating new article on the debate over Lawrence's sexuality at his blog <a href="http://www.maartenschild.com/lawrence/?p=312">here</a>. Very much worth a read.Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-88354297434506538022012-09-01T04:14:00.001-07:002012-09-01T04:14:35.461-07:00Stewart F. Newcome Blog<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitXqRk_NKWZUe25a5k9O8CehAFzc6sf4TWGtstybeKGYYqk4MOP5mOpEnlVTfe0769gCVHf9qgTIeTTN6XWtJNdtyGlACU7VkOSFHkkatFlshYn-g69Zg3gKI3toq04kojJnrKHSINQsh8/s1600/Newcombe.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitXqRk_NKWZUe25a5k9O8CehAFzc6sf4TWGtstybeKGYYqk4MOP5mOpEnlVTfe0769gCVHf9qgTIeTTN6XWtJNdtyGlACU7VkOSFHkkatFlshYn-g69Zg3gKI3toq04kojJnrKHSINQsh8/s320/Newcombe.jpg" width="255" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-N91tK7Cl54A/TsatjlZeH9I/AAAAAAAAAVY/gyZpMJsTcr0/s1600/SFN+by+John+Crealock.jpg">Source</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
During my web travels I encountered Kerry Webber's blog<a href="http://shadowofthecrescent.blogspot.com/"> In the Shadow of the Crescent</a>, a tribute page to Lawrence's friend and colleague Colonel Stewart F. Newcombe. It's an interesting site, with lots of pictures and detailed info about Newcombe and the Arab Revolt. It also appears that Mr. Webber is soon publishing his research in book form. Highly recommended.<br />
<br />
For those who aren't aware, the film <i>Lawrence of Arabia</i> is receiving<a href="http://www.fathomevents.com/classics/event/lawrenceofarabia.aspx?d=10%2F4%2F2012"> a 50th anniversary re-release in October</a>. I will definitely be posting about it on <a href="http://nothingiswrittenfilm.blogspot.com/">my film blog</a>. If any such pieces prove historically-minded (as opposed to film analysis etc.) I'll cross-post them here. <br />
<br />
I'm feeling a bit burned out on Lawrence right now and I will probably go on hiatus from this blog soon. I hope to knock off Victoria Ocampo's <i>338171 T.E. </i>beforehand, but Clare Sydney Smith may have to wait. Priorities.Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-82163093178021227282012-08-17T03:00:00.000-07:002013-03-16T17:28:08.519-07:0016 Questions With Professor Stephen E. Tabachnick<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0ldOqTdR5y5pXXT27ugszhK2uaY_YWkmVXm-2Tcbqh2K2p_7wrFzAfp1FlGoKZrvpxDWmxpTS0S-o87w-9yN6SA3MnCJ8pnGABm4eydeJUfnXsloHCyT6Pxu-2jS40dDw64kZWrs7oTLu/s1600/Tabachnick.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0ldOqTdR5y5pXXT27ugszhK2uaY_YWkmVXm-2Tcbqh2K2p_7wrFzAfp1FlGoKZrvpxDWmxpTS0S-o87w-9yN6SA3MnCJ8pnGABm4eydeJUfnXsloHCyT6Pxu-2jS40dDw64kZWrs7oTLu/s1600/Tabachnick.jpg" /></a></div>
<a href="http://www.memphis.edu/english/bios/tabachnick.htm">Stephen E. Tabachnick</a> is one of the world's foremost T.E. Lawrence experts. A Professor of English literature at the University of Memphis, he's written, co-written or edited several books on Lawrence: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/T-E-Lawrence-Puzzle/dp/082030669X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1345169214&sr=1-1&keywords=T.E.+LAWRENCE+PUZZLE"><i>The T.E. Lawrence Puzzle</i></a> (Athens, Ga.: University of Georgia Press, 1984)<i>, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Lawrence-Revised-Twaynes-English-Authors/dp/0805778004/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1345169148&sr=1-2&keywords=T.E.+LAWRENCE+STEPHEN+TABACHNICK">T.E. Lawrence</a></i> (New York: Twayne, 1997) and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Lawrence-Arabia-Encyclopedia-Stephen-Tabachnick/dp/0313305617/ref=la_B001H6SRL0_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1345169190&sr=1-2"><i>Lawrence of Arabia: An Encyclopedia</i></a> (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2004). Most importantly for us, he co-authored (with Christopher Matheson) <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Lawrence-CHRISTOPHER-MATHESON-STEPHEN-TABACHNICK/dp/0224025562/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1345169260&sr=1-1&keywords=IMAGES+OF+LAWRENCE"><i>Images of Lawrence</i></a> (London: Jonathan Cape, 1988), whose overview of Lawrence biographies largely inspired this blog. <br />
<br />
Professor Tabachnick graciously agreed to an email Q&A for this blog. I asked him about his books <i>Images of Lawrence</i> and <i>Lawrence of Arabia: An Encyclopedia</i>, along with his thoughts on Lawrence's reputation and the current state of scholarship. Enjoy!<br />
<br />
<b>1. What attracts you to Lawrence as a subject? </b><br />
<br />
He was a brilliant polymath who did more things well than almost anyone else of his period, and his Middle Eastern experience remains relevant to our own. Most of all, I think that he was a great writer whose<i> Seven Pillars of Wisdom</i> will live forever.<br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;">
</div>
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjoIekdaZlIq5L0WgpIlOZWbpdXDTFEsaTQT-iFSss5ImwZ5GdHJDFseCI6ZjGC1uoRGfgBHbhrIM9NclOcy2GZ9zzpx_CTgeDqYUKp3Ph_bJf9cWcO3khERy15SWw26bduZCxkLO_n07H0/s1600/ImagesTEL.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjoIekdaZlIq5L0WgpIlOZWbpdXDTFEsaTQT-iFSss5ImwZ5GdHJDFseCI6ZjGC1uoRGfgBHbhrIM9NclOcy2GZ9zzpx_CTgeDqYUKp3Ph_bJf9cWcO3khERy15SWw26bduZCxkLO_n07H0/s200/ImagesTEL.png" width="147" /></a><b>2. Your book Images of Lawrence largely dissects biographies and media portrayals of Lawrence. What do you consider the most common failing of Lawrence biographers? </b><br />
<br />
The most common failing of Lawrence biographers is to push a single thesis at the expense of the complexity of the subject. Anyone working on Lawrence has got to be open to his many contradictions and to the idea that as complex a person as he was cannot be easily made to fit a mold.<br />
<br />
<b>3. Why is Lawrence such a polarizing figure? </b><br />
<br />
Because <i>Seven Pillars of Wisdom</i> is full of ambiguities, including the Deraa incident, his own assessment of himself in the famous chapter 103, “Myself,” which contains many contradictions, and his divided loyalty between the British and Arab sides in the conflict. Some people (Aldington) take this as the equivalent of lying or disloyalty, while others (Mack and Wilson) are more accepting.<br />
<br />
<b>4. What are the most prevalent myths about Lawrence, either among the public or biographers? Why do you think they've taken hold?</b><br />
<br />
Perhaps the most prevalent myth is that he was some kind of liar, and that myth gives biographers something to write about, so they perpetuate it. Another myth is that he was an active homosexual, although there is no evidence for that. He undoubtedly had homosexual tendencies but there is little evidence that he ever acted on them. The public is always fascinated by sexuality of any kind, as we see in the attention given to the affairs of celebrities. And finally there is the myth that he was a straightforward hero, when he was a very divided person and was very critical of the hero designation for himself.<br />
<br />
<b> 5. How truthful should we consider<i> Seven Pillars of Wisdom</i>, <i>The Mint</i> and Lawrence's other writings? </b><br />
<br />
<i>Seven Pillars of Wisdom</i> and <i>The Mint</i> reflect the truth of who Lawrence was and what he thought. They are subjective autobiographies rather than objective histories of the events in which he was involved. I believe that he did his best to be truthful but sometimes—as in the case of the Deraa incident—he simply could not bring himself to fully describe and comment about embarrassing episodes. Rather, he chose to be ambiguous, leaving a fertile ground for subsequent critics and biographers to impose their own interpretations. Also, he chose not say much about important British intelligence assets that still might be operative in the Middle East after his departure. But this is not the equivalent of lying, and to characterize it as such is very misleading and sensationalist.<br />
<br />
<b>6. What value do the early Lawrence biographies, such as those by Lowell Thomas and Robert Graves, still hold? </b><br />
<br />
They will always remain valuable because they contain eyewitness testimony concerning Lawrence’s personality, and eyewitness testimony is irreplaceable. Moreover, both Thomas and Graves were very intelligent people and often provide insights into his personality.<br />
<br />
<b>7. In Images you gloss over the books written by Lawrence's friends (eg. <i>T.E. Lawrence by His Friends</i>, Clare Sydney Smith, Vyvyan Richards). Do you feel these personal portraits hold any value? </b><br />
<br />
Yes, these portraits are certainly valuable, especially the essays in <i>T.E. Lawrence by his Friends</i>, which gives a variety of points of view. Any eyewitness testimony is valuable since no more eyewitness testimony will be forthcoming, because just about everyone who knew Lawrence personally has died.<br />
<br />
<b>8. Richard Aldington's <i>Biographical Enquiry</i> (1955) is undoubtedly among the most important Lawrence books, since it's the first critical account. But it's also vicious and ultimately as problematic as earlier works. Do you think such an extreme reaction was necessary to balance the debate? </b><br />
<br />
I think that this kind of extreme reaction is never necessary in the case of any biographical subject, except perhaps the most loathsome, such as a Hitler or Stalin. Biographies should strive for balance in my view. But there’s no doubt that Aldington, by presenting such an extreme picture of Lawrence, helped move the debate forward since many people have responded to him to balance the picture. So, perhaps without meaning to be helpful, Aldington is responsible for a lot of excellent scholarship on and discussion of Lawrence.<br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJO7bOSNblgUT5d8jjxdNrJ2c0jMqwQzW6vH6NDJjLVSMPlluSyugNjrTfXg6M2zOIzd-I3a_j1Q92RzDWUGOp0AqBF5XMrYHtylZZo3tJo8BMAtFBPQ3xmNMGwsfDA-JzZu76IgpuOOxb/s1600/TEL+Puzzle.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJO7bOSNblgUT5d8jjxdNrJ2c0jMqwQzW6vH6NDJjLVSMPlluSyugNjrTfXg6M2zOIzd-I3a_j1Q92RzDWUGOp0AqBF5XMrYHtylZZo3tJo8BMAtFBPQ3xmNMGwsfDA-JzZu76IgpuOOxb/s200/TEL+Puzzle.jpg" width="133" /></a><b>9. There's still a lack of Arab sources on Lawrence available in English. Even Suleiman Mousa's <i>T.E. Lawrence: An Arab View</i> is hard to find. What effect do you think this has on Lawrence scholarship? </b><br />
<br />
It would be nice to have more Arab scholarship about Lawrence because some new evidence or information about him might be unearthed. But it is worth noticing that Mack, for instance, traveled to the Middle East to interview individuals about Lawrence and to see the sites where the events transpired, and that other Western writers have made that pilgrimage for the same reasons. So even without Arab scholarship per se outside of Mousa, it has been possible to bring Arabs and Arab culture into the picture of Lawrence’s career.<br />
<br />
<b>10. Do you feel that certain biographers (John Mack, Desmond Stewart, Michael Asher) focus excessively on Lawrence's psychology/personality/sexuality? </b><br />
<br />
Lawrence’s sexuality seems always to have interested the general reading public. Writing for a popular audience, Stewart and Asher focused on this subject in order to gain readership and sales, and I do believe that they focus excessively on Lawrence’s sexuality. However, John Mack, as a psychiatrist, naturally was interested in this aspect of Lawrence’s life, and I believe that he remains the best source on this subject as on Lawrence’s personality in general.<br />
<br />
<b>11. How does a writer decide which sources are valid? Many Lawrence biographers still quote Richard Meinertzhagen and John Bruce, for instance, despite their questionable veracity.</b><br />
<br />
Even when Meinertzhagen or Bruce might not be accurate concerning some things that they say about Lawrence, their testimony is still useful because they knew him. A scrupulous biographer must decide, on the basis of other, external evidence and cross-checking, which parts of their testimony might be useful and which not. Sometimes as in the case of Aldington, even the inaccurate things that someone says can be valuable in producing a counter-reaction that is more accurate.<br />
<br />
<b>12. What are your thoughts on Lawrence books published since Images' publication? Eg. Jeremy Wilson, Lawrence James, Michael Korda, any others? </b><br />
<br />
Jeremy Wilson’s biography remains one of the best because it is solidly based on archival evidence. His series of volumes of Lawrence’s writing—which like his biography I have reviewed in the journal <i>English Literature in Transition: 1880-1920</i> and in the <i>Shaw Annual</i>--is also an enormous gift to present and future scholarship on Lawrence. Philip O’Brien’s bibliography and its supplement are also extremely valuable. James and Korda in my view are popular writers whose research is not particularly outstanding, and who in my opinion do not contribute much that is truly new to the discussion.<br />
<br />
<b>13. What is the current state of Lawrence scholarship and debate? </b><br />
<br />
There have been some good books connecting Lawrence’s experience to ours in Iraq and elsewhere, such as John Hulsman’s <i>To Begin the World Over Again: Lawrence of Arabia from Damascus to Baghdad </i>(2009). And detailed academic studies of Lawrence, including doctoral dissertations, continue to be produced (most recently, in 2007, one by Vinothini Charles from the University of Madras, India, “The Search for Identity in the Writings of T.E. Lawrence and Sayyid Qutb,” which shows Lawrence’s worldwide fame, and Andrew Williams’ Canadian dissertation on <i>The Mint</i>, which is now a book, <i>The Toxic Morsel</i>). And there have been excellent exhibitions on Lawrence, especially “Lawrence von Arabien: Genese eines Mythos” at the Landesmuseum in Oldenburg, Germany during 2010-11, and the resulting superb catalog.<br />
<br />
But on the whole the most recent biographies, which are aimed at a popular audience, have not contributed much. I am always waiting for someone to find some genuinely new manuscript or archival material that will answer some of the questions we still have about Lawrence’s life and career. But like all discoveries, there is no knowing when such a thing might take place.<br />
<br />
<b>14. Do you find it more valuable to approach Lawrence's writings from a literary rather than historical perspective? </b><br />
<br />
As an English professor, I am naturally interested primarily in Lawrence as a writer. I believe that he was a great writer, and that he will increasingly come to be recognized as such. The Longman Anthology of English Literature, a textbook used in the classroom, now includes a passage from <i>Seven Pillars of Wisdom</i> along with selections from other important writers’ works.<br />
<br />
But it is impossible to write about him as a writer without considering the historical perspective; and that perspective will continue to be very important in helping us understand the Middle East now and in the future.<br />
<br />
<b>15. How did you get the idea to compile your Lawrence encyclopedia? What sort of effort goes into a project like that? </b><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgMc4DGfLxOlzZFvO_Qr0pODtInv8d9NGZP6dfpifsb42CF1_S5fOygbtP3WiWkiCbNQWHpZPP1pEqDJ5vzhmB_S_AeueSi9MlArMUgYpH8pVzbYIRIXfE-Fg0hb_iBD9x29f3bV1r8yzQm/s1600/Lawrence+Encyclopedia.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgMc4DGfLxOlzZFvO_Qr0pODtInv8d9NGZP6dfpifsb42CF1_S5fOygbtP3WiWkiCbNQWHpZPP1pEqDJ5vzhmB_S_AeueSi9MlArMUgYpH8pVzbYIRIXfE-Fg0hb_iBD9x29f3bV1r8yzQm/s200/Lawrence+Encyclopedia.jpg" width="139" /></a>Biographies and critical books on Lawrence usually push the author’s thesis to the detriment of other viewpoints. I wrote the Lawrence encyclopedia because I felt that there was a gap in the scholarship on Lawrence, in that no one source brought together all of the disparate views about him as well as all aspects of his career, and that an encyclopedia would fill that gap, both for general readers and for scholars.<br />
<br />
I have written on article about the problems involved in writing the encyclopedia—“An Attempt to Map the Lawrence Territory: Writing Lawrence of Arabia: An Encyclopedia” which appeared in the<i> Journal of the T.E. Lawrence Society, 16.1</i> (Autumn/Winter 2006-7): 17-27. This article was based on a paper I gave at the excellent international Lawrence conference at Lee University, near Chattanooga, Tennessee in April 2006.<br />
<br />
Essentially, writing the encyclopedia was a labor of love and I enjoyed working steadily on it for about five years. To write an encyclopedia like this, you first have to compile a list of important topics and then work through each one until you finally complete the work. I am pleased that many people, including academic researchers, seem to find the encyclopedia helpful, or at least they have told me so.<br />
<br />
<b>16. Do you have any current projects, Lawrence-related or otherwise, in the works? </b><br />
<br />
In the past few years, I have published an essay on Lawrence in the Oldenburg exhibition catalog, and have written several reviews of works about Lawrence. The reviews are to be found in the journal <i>English Literature in Transition: 1880-1920</i> (which, much to its credit, has always been interested in studies of Lawrence), and in the forthcoming <i>Shaw Annual</i>.<br />
<br />
Over the past twenty years, I’ve become interested in the graphic novel, and I gave a paper on Lawrence and the comics at the Huntington Library symposium in 2007. I’d like to turn that into an article one day. Also, I am interested in possibly doing a second edition of the encyclopedia, which would contain revisions of any factual or other errors based on the latest information.<br />
<br />
* * *<br />
<br />
Many thanks to Professor Tabachnick for his time. Hopefully this can become a regular feature as I come into contact with other Lawrence experts. I will have several new reviews coming up soon, so stay tuned.Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-59919025573359333032012-08-11T17:06:00.002-07:002012-08-12T12:12:09.359-07:00Hero: The Life and Legend of Lawrence of Arabia (2010, Michael Korda)<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjA7U_P9sjXhZsL3uNestISNdlXjBLe7m8FCfc2pQw0DtJRp8SmD4qFAjDLWLxKWX-dm26-_jRUG2QNhGsD2SAll3MacENELKdkQIuoXBGJCZghe11i-DSJ8_Wg0e_XFgDGt6FQCbIINHc2/s1600/Hero.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjA7U_P9sjXhZsL3uNestISNdlXjBLe7m8FCfc2pQw0DtJRp8SmD4qFAjDLWLxKWX-dm26-_jRUG2QNhGsD2SAll3MacENELKdkQIuoXBGJCZghe11i-DSJ8_Wg0e_XFgDGt6FQCbIINHc2/s320/Hero.jpg" width="212" /></a></div>
<b>Publishing Info:</b><br />
<br />
Korda, Michael. <i>Hero: The Life and Legend of Lawrence of Arabia</i>. New York: HarperCollins, 2010. 762 pp.<br />
<br />
<b>Introduction:</b><br />
<br />
The most comprehensive Lawrence bio in 20 years, <i>Hero</i> attempts to repair Lawrence's reputation. Michael Korda might go a step too far in proclaiming Lawrence as a genius in everything he touched. Still, it's a judicious treatment of a man oft criticized but never fully understood.<br />
<br />
<b>The Author:</b><br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2GcVy_LHpx2Ojcpl1U42XLAO2FtLJV3uWtifFEz2Qj5YgbWs2TewIuYNwMvVPWAfPNePa0g6B_XekuohjAjn-_POBeB2kVQmHd_BkdJnvHxnl2rR7g6zrKE_nkAXnGyc8oBwyzUOElG07/s1600/Korda.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2GcVy_LHpx2Ojcpl1U42XLAO2FtLJV3uWtifFEz2Qj5YgbWs2TewIuYNwMvVPWAfPNePa0g6B_XekuohjAjn-_POBeB2kVQmHd_BkdJnvHxnl2rR7g6zrKE_nkAXnGyc8oBwyzUOElG07/s320/Korda.jpg" width="252" /></a></div>
<br />
Michael Korda (born 1933) is the son of Zoltan Korda of the legendary British film family. Moving to New York, Korda spent decades as editor at Simon & Schuster, gaining notoriety for publishing racy novelists Jacqueline Susan and Harold Robbins. He's written numerous books, including biographies of Ulysses S. Grant and Dwight D. Eisenhower, <i>Queenie </i>(1985), a novel about his aunt Merle Oberon, and <i>With Wings Like Eagles</i> (2009), an account of the Battle of Britain.<b> </b><br />
<br />
<b>The Review:</b><br />
<br />
<i>Hero</i> is a popular history with all the attendant virtues and foibles. It's extremely readable, Korda handling a dense, detailed narrative with delicacy. On the other hand, Korda's analysis of specialist areas (Middle Eastern politics, psychology) are shaky, with an unhappy reliance on secondary sources. He lards the text with awkward cultural allusions, such as quoting <i>Casablanca</i> when discussing Lawrence's pre-war encounter with an Arab bandit or comparing his subject to Princess Diana (!).<br />
<br />
Korda begins <i>in media res</i> with Lawrence's most famous exploit: the 1917 capture of Aqaba. This awkward opening lasts for 100 pages before backtracking to Lawrence's childhood. Lay readers may prove overwhelmed by the barrage of dates, names and places, and Lawrence experts will note Korda's heavy reliance on <i>Seven Pillars</i> and Basil Liddell Hart. Fortunately, <i>Hero</i> recovers from this shaky start.<br />
<br />
Unlike most biographers, Korda focuses on Lawrence's relationship with father Thomas Chapman. Noting Chapman's love of technology and intellectual pursuits, Korda also feels he shielded Lawrence from his mother's more extreme impulses. "Ned not only learned from his father but worked hard to please him" (144), ultimately besting Chapman at his own hobbies. Korda's Sarah Lawrence mixes guilt, piety and protectiveness, but scarcely resembles the monster of<a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2010/12/lawrence-of-arabia-biographical-enquiry.html"> Richard Aldington</a> and Michael Asher's accounts.<br />
<br />
<br />
<i>Hero</i> rejects common portrayals of Lawrence as neurotic. Korda depicts him as exceedingly erudite and likeable, with a "particular genius for friendship" (508) and craving for recognition. Korda views Lawrence as asexual but capable of strong attachments to men (Vyvyan Richards, Dahoum) and women (Janet Laurie, Charlotte Shaw, Clare Sydney Smith). Lawrence's ambivalence towards fame is a quirk rather than psychosis. In this account, Lawrence remains essentially the same man lifelong, despite his war-time trauma and guilt. <br />
<br />
By Korda's reckoning, "there was always a germ of truth" to Lawrence's recollection of events (442). Korda discusses Deraa at length, accepting its validity because of the account's vividness, Lawrence's injuries and private correspondence afterwards. He accepts <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2010/12/secret-lives-of-lawrence-of-arabia.html">Knightley and Simpson</a>'s suggestion that Lawrence confused Hajim Bey with another Turkish officer. More minor anecdotes (Lawrence making Lord Curzon cry at a war cabinet meeting, forcing an obnoxious officer to salute him) are found equally plausible. His collaboration with Lowell Thomas amounts to idle ribbing that spectacularly backfired. Far from a braggart or liar, Lawrence at worst misremembered or playfully embellished events.<br />
<br />
Korda grows rhapsodic discussing the Arab Revolt. He consistently plays up Lawrence's role, even his marginal involvement in Russia's capture of Erzurum and the diplomatic mission to Kut. Lawrence's colleagues receive due attention, though Korda uncritically accepts <i>Seven Pillars</i>' account of Feisal and his brothers. He echoes Liddell Hart in claiming Lawrence a self-taught military genius comparable to Napoleon and a pioneer in guerrilla warfare. Korda is extremely adept at battle writing, providing riveting descriptions of Arab victories at Abu el-Lissal and Tafileh. Lawrence's personal bravery is justly never in doubt.<br />
<br />
Korda claims "no man ever tried harder to serve two masters than Lawrence" (400), desperately trying to square Arab sympathies with English allegiance. He depicts Lawrence's defense of Feisal at Versailles, criticism of imperial policy and involvement in the Cairo Conference. Korda's grasp of Sykes-Picot and the Balfour Declaration are fuzzy, undeniably inflating Lawrence's importance. One is amused by the assertion that the Hashemites brought stability to the Middle East: arguably true of Jordan, not so much with Iraq or the Hejaz. But Korda's account of Lawrence's rapturous reception in post-war Jordan demolishes the revisionist view that he was just another military adviser.<br />
<br />
Sections on Lawrence's post-war career dabble heavily in speculation. Not unreasonably, Korda views Lawrence's descent into the Tank Corps and RAF more as an attempt to escape his wartime responsibility than a retreat from fame. He's undeniably right in rejecting <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2011/04/te-lawrence-1977-desmond-stewart.html">Desmond Stewart</a>'s claim of Fascist sympathies. But Korda depicts Lawrence as a lifelong masochist, even while casting doubt on John Bruce's stories of flogging. Lawrence's youthful obsession with fitness becomes a prelude to self-torture in this dubious reading.<br />
<br />
Balancing the conjecture are astute observations. We see a Lawrence whose work with boats and seaplanes was extremely productive. He also used his connections to affect RAF reform, and Lawrence's sympathy for rankers comes off strongly. Korda amusingly etches Lawrence's equivocation towards the limelight: he attends Bernard Shaw's <i>Too True to Be Good</i> incognito, only to sign autographs after the show! He shows Clare Sydney Smith as "the only woman who actually flirted with Lawrence, an experience... he seems to have enjoyed" (607). Far from a miserable hermit, Lawrence experiences "the best and most productive years of his life" (509).<br />
<br />
Korda finds <i>Seven Pillars</i> overwritten but concedes it features "great pieces of modern writing about war" (310). He does defend its essential truthfulness, despite Lawrence's personalized view and downplaying the roles of men he disliked (Colonel Bremond, Hubert Young). On the other hand, he finds <i>The Mint</i> an implausible depiction of the RAF. Korda saves his greatest praise for Lawrence's translation of <i>The Odyssey</i>, feeling "nobody... understood better than Lawrence the difficulties facing a warrior... returning home, or could write more feelingly about it" (661).<br />
<br />
<i>Hero</i> is a very good, old-fashioned biography. Perhaps Korda's idolatry is a bit much, but proves a welcome corrective to lingering skepticism. T.E. Lawrence is finally restored to his place as a genuine hero, warts and all.<br />
<br />
PS: Readers stay tuned! I have a very special treat coming soon.Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-79738209083269534752012-08-01T17:08:00.004-07:002012-08-09T16:53:59.935-07:00The Desert and the Stars (1955, Flora Armitage)<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhTIXPXCyZrNMvSAjBwdr2bpiN3z1ruka4HrPm7570Gxa3H2tyHXMzOQzsP3vJ3SSrE4oF0g1CfsbjaOROtvlrY-xDkCn_R9dp4o5abMLZj7eHbdRTzgIzSmAzjDtE_sm5d3qXoF0Cjr5Pf/s1600/Desert+Stars.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhTIXPXCyZrNMvSAjBwdr2bpiN3z1ruka4HrPm7570Gxa3H2tyHXMzOQzsP3vJ3SSrE4oF0g1CfsbjaOROtvlrY-xDkCn_R9dp4o5abMLZj7eHbdRTzgIzSmAzjDtE_sm5d3qXoF0Cjr5Pf/s320/Desert+Stars.png" width="232" /></a></div>
<b>Publishing Info:</b><br />
<br />
Armitage, Flora. <i>The Desert and the Stars: A Biography of Lawrence of Arabia</i>. New York: Henry Holt, 1955. 318 pp.<br />
<br />
<b>Introduction:</b><br />
<br />
Written simultaneous to Richard Aldington's <i>Biographical Inquiry</i> (and tweaked before publication), <i>The Desert and the Stars</i> reads like an extreme reaction to that skeptical tome. An admirable attempt at probing Lawrence's psyche, Armitage falls short of an effective portrait.<br />
<br />
<b>The Author:</b><br />
<br />
Flora Armitage (1911-1995) was an English-born writer who spent most of her life in the United States. At the time she wrote The Desert and the Stars, she worked for the British Information Services in New York City. She published three novels and several collections of short stories, as well as essays published in the UK and US. Dartmouth College has a collection of her papers <a href="http://ead.dartmouth.edu/html/ms805.html">here</a>.<br />
<br />
<b>The Review:</b><br />
<br />
The biggest hurdle with <i>The Desert and the Stars</i> is its unfortunate style. Armitage's novelist instincts overwhelm her sober subject matter, and we're treated to laughably overripe palaver on the most banal subjects. For instance, Armitage writes of Lawrence's birthplace (p. 16):<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"The house at Tremadoc... stood in the midst of a garden where the August flowers bowed their heads to the wind, and over which islands of Atlantic cumulus moved in shadowing phalanxes. To the south of Tremadoc the waters of a bay shimmered; and to the north the green foothills rose slowly up to the craggy peak of Snowdon."</blockquote>
<br />
Later, describing the fort at Azrak (p. 115):<br />
<blockquote class="tr_bq">
"In winter a desolation more acute overtook it, for it was swept then by northeast winds and buffeted with driving rains. A pestilent dampness inflicted it, and a long and lingering melancholy which hovered like a hidden enemy in the gloomy passageways, waited upon the unwary, to swoop, to seize, to destory. Like a banshee the wind blew notes of doom through the volcanic rock towers which echoed into the shivering quiet below, trembled there, and then departed until the next gust."</blockquote>
<br />
This reader finds a little purple prose goes a long way. 300-plus pages of it are insufferable.<br />
<br />
Other style points niggle, too. Throughout, Armitage insists on calling her subject "Edward Lawrence." Perhaps this is to distinguish him from his father, except she continues this affectation after the senior Lawrence departs. Awkward literary and Biblical allusions riddle the text to no effect. Ms. Armitage should have spent less time displaying her erudition than exploring her subject.<br />
<br />
Armitage addresses many of Aldington's critiques. She concedes several points on Lawrence's honesty, but takes a more benign view. Recounting his claim of having read every book in the Oxford Union (tediously debunked by Aldington), she sniffs that "it is surely pedantic to take [it] seriously" (26). I'm inclined to agree; Lawrence's dishonesty was certainly more playful than pathological. She similarly addresses his claims about Lawrence's childhood; his alleged hatred of women; his heroism, politics and sexuality. It's a convincing rebuttal to Lawrence debunkers, though obviously not conclusive.<br />
<br />
In this telling, Lawrence has a happy childhood. Armitage tiptoes over Lawrence's illegitimacy and describes him as a precocious child, mixing his mother's strength of character and morality with his father's love of history and machines. His time at Oxford and Carchemish receives almost idyllic treatment, his relationships with Dahoum and D.G. Hogarth lacking the sexual/political implications of later biographers. It seems fairly bowdlerized, even if one rejects Aldington's portrait of subtle repression. Armitage's repeating of apocryphal canards - for instance, that Lawrence's youthful leg fracture retarded his growth - somewhat weakens her credibility.<br />
<br />
Armitage skims over Lawrence's war years, stopping for introspection only at Deraa and Damascus. Aqaba gets a few paragraphs, while the Tafas massacre receives a single sentence. She makes little effort to address the Revolt's effectiveness, though her assessment of Hussein as "a crotchety, devious-minded but sincere Arab patriot" (102) rings true. Less so does her implication that Lawrence was the Revolt's only worthwhile personage. Either Armitage had little interest in the subject or felt it would be familiar from past books. <br />
<br />
Armitage excels, however, with Lawrence's post-war career. Aside from "personal portraits" like Claire Sydney Smith's <i>The Golden Reign</i>, most biographers up to 1955 elided his later activities, and Armitage's detailed description deserves commendation. She depicts Lawrence's unhappy stint in the Tank Corps, service in India and famous friends with skill. We encounters a Lawrence struggling with his fame, detesting life in the ranks and finding solace in technical achievements and unorthodox companions. It's only missing the testimony of witnesses like John Bruce, unavoidable in its era.<br />
<br />
Armitage echoes Robert Graves in calling Lawrence "an iceberg... display(ing) a myriad of dazzling shapes and contours, though the inner matrix is forever hidden" (307). She views Lawrence's aversion to feminine company as product of his college and war experience rather than misogyny. "His hatred for sex should not be misconstrued... as a hatred of women," she chides (254). Similarly, she rebukes claims of Lawrence as budding Fascist, claiming that he "never had any message for mankind" (266). She ultimately views him as "a spirit so modern in vision and temper that his century has not caught up with him" (307) - a man who mixed the virtues of the scholar and soldier with nagging self-doubt and interior demons.<br />
<br />
Despite its merits, <i>The Desert and the Stars</i> proves underwhelming. If one overlooks the acres of aureate verbiage it's readable, but offers few original insights or penetrating analyses.Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-72585013410697762912012-07-12T17:30:00.001-07:002012-08-09T18:39:21.628-07:00Setting the Desert on Fire: T.E. Lawrence and Britain's Secret War in Arabia, 1916-1918 (2006, James Barr)<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUXyM2LD_ZuvAqNxlbISebGYCVePJikNA9yvGUu8B0iUPoprlBmctxpPZVHBFiKO16iV_eWyXIJm-5stZ4YMSVt_tElsnvi88bGjKYuM0Ps6KQTMj49sk4PaUc2-wo1s2-K1w8GvDDwBiV/s1600/Barr+Desert.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUXyM2LD_ZuvAqNxlbISebGYCVePJikNA9yvGUu8B0iUPoprlBmctxpPZVHBFiKO16iV_eWyXIJm-5stZ4YMSVt_tElsnvi88bGjKYuM0Ps6KQTMj49sk4PaUc2-wo1s2-K1w8GvDDwBiV/s320/Barr+Desert.jpg" width="213px" /></a></div>
<b>Publishing Info:</b><br />
<br />
Barr, James. <i>Setting the Desert on Fire: T.E. Lawrence and Britain's Secret War in Arabia, 1916-1918</i>. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2008 (paperback). Originally published 2006. 382 pp.<br />
<br />
<b>Introduction:</b><br />
<br />
Since 9/11, increased American and British involvement in the Middle East has revived interest in World War I's Middle Eastern theaters. Looking for historical background on the region, causes for Islamic resentment of the West, understanding of Arab cultures, or pointers on combating insurgency, a slew of authors penned dozens of new books on this previously-neglected theater. Lawrence's own writings (especially the <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&sqi=2&ved=0CFQQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwwi.lib.byu.edu%2Findex.php%2FThe_27_Articles_of_T.E._Lawrence&ei=klb_T8zwCOnx0gG6jI30BA&usg=AFQjCNGwJlvT8MWWYr-lhinUpmmUMPMLSg">27 Articles</a>) have been standard reading for US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.<br />
<br />
James Barr's lively book is more a general history of the Arab Revolt than a biography. Thus, my review will be unusually succinct. Nonetheless, Lawrence becomes the central figure in Barr's narrative, and <i>Setting the Desert on Fire</i> provides a fine portrayal of his exploits.<br />
<br />
<b>The Author:</b><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh9ehLRkZz9A-L1Wg0t0RM7YgEYlphb1Ich1ytvpFFZlSRwdFDY0HLPZDAzuhqYILLJKgQYagZLL9VlrMRqXW7b4ajRESxAgUDfl2uHx7hF-_pkHgKXKS6cMC8sJqyNKhkBtXoN34N38EyK/s1600/Barr.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh9ehLRkZz9A-L1Wg0t0RM7YgEYlphb1Ich1ytvpFFZlSRwdFDY0HLPZDAzuhqYILLJKgQYagZLL9VlrMRqXW7b4ajRESxAgUDfl2uHx7hF-_pkHgKXKS6cMC8sJqyNKhkBtXoN34N38EyK/s1600/Barr.jpg" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
James Barr is a journalist for the <i>Daily Telegraph</i>, an historian and an expert on the Middle East. He has recently published a follow-up volume, <i>A Line in the Sand: The Anglo-French Struggle for the Middle East, 1914-1948</i> (2011). His website can be found <a href="http://www.jamesbarr.org.uk/Index.html">here</a>; his Lawrence-related blog <a href="http://desertonfire.blogspot.com/">here</a>.<br />
<br />
<b>The Review:</b><br />
<br />
Preparing for this project, Barr traveled extensively in the Middle East and trawled through British and French archives, taking advantage of new documents. His book contains much original research, but frustratingly little fresh analysis. <br />
<br />
Barr scores most in portraying the Revolt's background. He spiritedly depicts the politicking amongst the British and French, each keen on establishing their own spheres of influence; disputes among military and political leaders over the Revolt's necessity; Lawrence's interactions with testy, skeptical superiors. He gives fair coverage to Lawrence's colleagues, both British and French, showing the Arab Revolt to have been a team effort. He also briefly addresses the post-war political fall-out, as broken promises "created a reservoir of deep resentment" in the Islamic world (322). Barr commendably strips this convoluted background down to readable length.<br />
<br />
In Barr's account, the Arab Revolt was worthwhile militarily and defensible politically (at least for the Arabs). He gives a complex portrait of Sherif Hussein and his sons, showing them a mixture of self-interest and nationalist fervor. True, the Arabs were ridden by tribal faction and often avaricious. The staunch religiosity of the Sherif alienated nationalist "Town Arabs" in Syria who may otherwise have supported the uprising. Many, like Howeitat warlord Auda abu Tayi, blew hot-and-cold in their allegiance. But overall their military utility outweighed their small numbers and fractious nature, providing crucial support to Allenby's invasion of Syria.<br />
<br />
Perhaps inevitably, Lawrence takes center stage. Bare depicts him heroically, as a brave man, skilled diplomat and expert military leader. While Barr notes Lawrence's propensity to stretch the truth (especially his strategic "revelations" at Wadi Ais), he argues that official records often support Lawrence's accounts. Most notably, he lays to rest any lingering doubts about Lawrence's "Northern Ride," showing that "recently unearthed British and French intelligence reports... corroborate the most audacious episode in Lawrence's story" (162). It's a limited portrait, but effective so far as it goes. <br />
<br />
Barr's one bombshell regards Deraa. Using an electrostatic detection apparatus (ESDA) on Lawrence's journal, he analyzes pen compressions to argue that missing pages indicate Lawrence was in Azrak, not Deraa, in late November 1917. "This new evidence makes it seem likely that Lawrence removed the page... because its contents did not correlate" with <i>Seven Pillars</i>' account of torture and rape, says Barr (206). While I lack technical expertise to critique Barr's method, his interpretation (that an impression of an A means Lawrence was at Azrak) isn't enitrely convincing.<br />
<br />
<i>Setting the Desert on Fire</i> is hardly the most incisive Lawrence book. For providing a concise, lucid account the Arab Revolt though, James Barr surely deserves high praise.Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-7325311552035752182011-11-23T16:44:00.001-08:002012-08-09T16:38:28.714-07:00The Golden Warrior: The Life and Legend of Lawrence of Arabia (1990, Lawrence James)<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-y5vlpvCETE773isx7NVB8BviCm9G4vtKHg-269WQ378DnK5BjJwzYIv9Q_hDFdT_1a0Op5GULxf2FM7zSkiGDNKdNR5d4LuTpcd6eZSIcc0Hf1FZ8BlZZOYrw_m63p9MObLTEwAJjgJJ/s1600/Golden+Warrior.jpg"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5678357132486089714" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh-y5vlpvCETE773isx7NVB8BviCm9G4vtKHg-269WQ378DnK5BjJwzYIv9Q_hDFdT_1a0Op5GULxf2FM7zSkiGDNKdNR5d4LuTpcd6eZSIcc0Hf1FZ8BlZZOYrw_m63p9MObLTEwAJjgJJ/s320/Golden+Warrior.jpg" style="cursor: hand; display: block; height: 320px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 206px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<b>Publishing Info:</b><br />
<br />
James, Lawrence. <i>The Golden Warrior: The Life and Legend of Lawrence of Arabia</i>. New York: Skyhorse, 2008. Original publication 1990. 523 pp.<br />
<br />
<b>Introduction:</b><br />
<br />
By the late '80s the Lawrence debate became relatively balanced. Rather than the hysterical black-and-white arguments of the post-Aldington era, shades of gray crept into the debate as new sources and original research appeared. A more interesting Lawrence emerged, even as authors continued to project themselves onto him.<br />
<br />
<i>The Golden Warrior: The Life and Legend of Lawrence of Arabia</i> attempts a straight academic biography. Lawrence James provides relatively little original research or fresh insight, and his analysis occasionally grates. Nonetheless, he deserves credit for an intriguingly complex portrait of Lawrence.<br />
<br />
<b>The Author:</b><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg0MTZ3Gj3UpRY62G5n4ZVradFpY0oc-dUULNzmxsMD5eRliiEDZdSsPQV4cBy2lQTHZ1HUpNL30BQUrx22ATlmT2du-ME5UZVOr_QTXAwRQpgxMswKoHndnUau78NFWlb2EZGuvpnfYXAO/s1600/James.jpg"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5678358702636760850" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg0MTZ3Gj3UpRY62G5n4ZVradFpY0oc-dUULNzmxsMD5eRliiEDZdSsPQV4cBy2lQTHZ1HUpNL30BQUrx22ATlmT2du-ME5UZVOr_QTXAwRQpgxMswKoHndnUau78NFWlb2EZGuvpnfYXAO/s320/James.jpg" style="cursor: hand; display: block; height: 230px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 150px;" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.andrewlownie.co.uk/authors/lawrence-james">Lawrence James</a> (born 1943) is an acclaimed British historian and journalist. Besides the present book, he has written extensively on British history, including the excellent <i>The Rise and Fall of the British Empire</i> (1994), <i>Raj: The Making and Unmaking of British India</i> (1997), <i>Warrior Race: A History of the British at War</i> (2001), and biographies of the Duke of Wellington and Lord Edmund Allenby. His most recent work is <i>Aristocrats: Britain's Great Ruling Class from 1066 to the Present</i> (2010).<br />
<br />
<b>The Review:</b><br />
<br />
Despite his cynicism towards the "Lawrence legend," James scrupulously rebukes many outlandish critical claims. Addressing <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2010/12/secret-lives-of-lawrence-of-arabia.html">Knightley and Simpson</a>'s accusation of pre-war espionage, James argues Lawrence the archaeologist "would have found out nothing... not already well-known to the British government" (45). He also dismisses conspiracy theorizing about Lawrence's death as "thriller fantasy" (495). Between this and his healthy skepticism towards Lawrence's own writings, James establishes himself as a credible biographer.<br />
<br />
The most interesting sections involve the development of the Lawrence legend. James has a deep background in British history, and he does a great job placing Lawrence's fame in context. In the grim aftermath of World War I, James shows how much the English-speaking world <i>needed</i> a hero like Lawrence, who mixed traditional romanticism with modern "common man" appeal. He also excellently captures Lawrence's complicity in starting the legend, and mixed feelings of its perpetuation. James ends the book with an overview of Lawrence's portrayal in biography and popular media, growing and mutating to meet cultural needs and the whims of his biographers.<br />
<br />
Like other authors, James views Lawrence through his perceived fantasies. Chafing at a strict but not unhappy childhood, the young Lawrence tested his physical limits, traveled abroad and plunged himself into foreign cultures. Enraptured by <i>Morte d'Arthur</i> and <i>The Odyssey</i>, Lawrence viewed his life as a saga, casting himself as its oversized hero. This medievalism also informs Lawrence's love of the simple Bedouin and aversion towards the educated "town Arabs." <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2011/04/prince-of-our-disorder-life-of-te.html">John Mack</a> and <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2011/04/te-lawrence-1977-desmond-stewart.html">Desmond Stewart</a> advanced ideas of this argument on a personal level, but James explores it in the broader context of Edwardian England.<br />
<br />
When James gets to the war years, his analysis grows mixed. He convincingly argues that Lawrence's views on the Middle East - especially his skepticism towards France and hatred of Turkey - evolved in concert with his Arab Bureau colleagues, belying the idea that Lawrence was a committed imperialist from the start. He disparages the Arab Revolt, conceding its propaganda value but trotting out the old canard of gold-hungry tribesmen. He argues the Arabs achieved little militarily, a questionable assessment in light of recent books like James Barr's <i>Setting the Desert on Fire</i>. Despite these critiques, James gladly acknowledges Lawrence's skill and courage in the desert.<br />
<br />
James adds little new or insightful in dealing with Lawrence's strange post-war career. He dutifully recounts Lawrence's work in the Colonial Office, his attempts to serve as a "gentleman ranker," his bizarre relationship with John Bruce and brushing shoulders with the likes of Bernard Shaw and <a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2010/12/lawrence-and-arabian-adventure-aka.html">Robert Graves</a> while dining with gruff RAF flyers. Lawrence's post-war career is fascinating, but James doesn't bring much to the table here.<br />
<br />
James casts a skeptical eye on <i>Seven Pillars of Wisdom</i>, pointedly highlighting Lawrence's exaggerations. Interestingly, James notes Lawrence's embellishment extended to his official reports, rendering many contemporary documents suspect. However, James' textual analysis is also spotty. He views Lawrence's descriptions of the Deraa incident and Turkish atrocities at Tafas as justification for later Arab massacres of the Turks. The bloodcurdling depiction of Tafas, and Lawrence's loudly-stated revulsion to bloodshed, seem to bely James's argument. James is wedded to the idea of <i>Seven Pillars</i> as a carefully-structured novel, interesting in specific cases but overstated in general.<br />
<br />
James devotes a long chapter to Lawrence's capture and rape at Deraa (pp. 245-263). He raises the usual objections, from Lawrence's inconsistency in accounts to some eyewitness testimony to Hajim Bey's heterosexuality. His bombshell is a diary entry from a colleague at Aqaba, which supposedly proves Lawrence could not have been in Deraa at the time of incident. Jeremy Wilson, however, <a href="http://www.telstudies.org/discussion/rejected_legend/rejected_legend_deraa.shtml">has shown</a> this diary conflicts with other contemporary documents. James moves on from factual matters to speculation that Deraa serves as a "coded" admission of Lawrence's sexual preference. <br />
<br />
James goes beyond the usual arguments by claiming that Lawrence was a practicing homosexual. He makes the most of <i>Seven Pillars</i>' description of Bedouin man-love, and John Bruce's tale of flogging is hard to discount. Beyond these old chestnuts, James is grasping at straws. He repeats Desmond Stewart's spurious "Bluebeard" story, liberally quotes the dubious Richard Meinertzhagen ("boy or girl?") and even suggests Lawrence was about to be arrested for indecency prior to his death. The fact that such rumors existed is suggestive, but does not constitute evidence.<br />
<br />
<i>The Golden Warrior</i> remains a worthy biography all the same. If James criticizes Lawrence's vanity and self-aggrandizement, he also praises his genius, heroism, tactical skill and charisma. "Why Lawrence felt impelled to embellish his achievement and then repudiate the fame they offered him remains inexplicable," James notes (433), nicely summing up one of history's most enigmatic figures.Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-83295570560027543782011-11-20T12:39:00.000-08:002011-11-20T12:48:11.769-08:00Groggy ReturnsI'm back from a seven-month hiatus with a new crop of Lawrence bios. Time permitting (my job doesn't allow for the time required for a good, well-thought-out analysis) I will have reviews of two more Lawrence bios up soon: Vyvyan Richards' <em>Portrait of T.E. Lawrence</em> and Lawrence James' <em>The Golden Warrior: The Life and Legend of Lawrence of Arabia</em>. These will be the first two books not covered in <em><a href="http://telawrence.blogspot.com/2010/12/images-of-lawrence-1988-stephen-e.html">Images of Lawrence</a></em>, the book which inspired this blog in the first place, so I hope I can do them justice.<br /><br />In the meantime, there are at least two new Lawrence biographies just released: James Schneider's <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Guerrilla-Leader-Lawrence-Revolt/dp/0553807641/ref=sr_1_5?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1321821513&sr=1-5">Guerilla Leader: T.E. Lawrence and the Arab Revolt</a></em>, which appears to be an analysis of Lawrene's military leadership, and Joseph Berton's <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/T-LAWRENCE-ARAB-REVOLT-Illustrated/dp/849665835X/ref=sr_1_8?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1321821769&sr=1-8">T.E. Lawrence and the Arab Revolt: An Illustrated Guide</a></em>. Also Jeremy Wilson appears to be preparing a new edition of his <a href="http://blog.castlehillpress.com/chpblog/2011/11/06/authorised-biography/">authorized biography</a>.<br /><br />One of the benefits of being a Lawrence enthusiast is there's never a shortage of reading material. Keep an eye on this blog for more updates.Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-7644131552894305992011-04-21T15:08:00.002-07:002012-08-01T19:52:54.238-07:00T.E. Lawrence, or the Search for the Absolute (1955, Jean Beraud-Villars)<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi8geJCGcmzIy22-KGCKI7wgwwgNJu0VlTt4XPzkqc4rjVTb8wPHR8mP9tGnH-JP-zMMyFDFCQuNZXHUIYjkiCZf_3YThlizVBt_0jJgIMSHCkIV19TNbX8q5dLLjcDk7CyhQjHb4ew9PBH/s1600/TELAbsolute.jpg" onblur="function onblur()
{
try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}
}"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5598163608990434562" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi8geJCGcmzIy22-KGCKI7wgwwgNJu0VlTt4XPzkqc4rjVTb8wPHR8mP9tGnH-JP-zMMyFDFCQuNZXHUIYjkiCZf_3YThlizVBt_0jJgIMSHCkIV19TNbX8q5dLLjcDk7CyhQjHb4ew9PBH/s320/TELAbsolute.jpg" style="display: block; height: 264px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 199px;" /></a><br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Publishing Info:</span><br />
<br />
Beraud-Villars, Jean. <span style="font-style: italic;">T.E. Lawrence or the Search for the Absolute</span>. New York: Duell, Sloan and Pearce, 1959. Original French publication 1955. 358 pp.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">Introduction:</span><br />
<br />
This interesting biography might be called <span style="font-style: italic;">T.E. Lawrence: A French View</span>. One of a surprising number of French books on Lawrence, it presents one of the most balanced and interesting portrayals of Lawrence, holding up well even after fifty-plus years of research and revelations. Only when the author lets his personal hobby horse interfere in the narrative - i.e., by depicting Lawrence as a Francophobe - does the book test one's patience.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">The Author:</span><br />
<br />
I couldn't find much biographical information on Beraud-Villars. He served in the First World War as a French pilot and had a prolific career as a military historian. His most famous work is probably <span style="font-style: italic;">Diary of a Lost Airman</span> (1918), an autobiographical account of his wartime service.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;">The Review:</span><br />
<br />
Almost every Lawrence biographer has an ax to grind, and few do a good job of hiding it. Lowell Thomas had wartime propaganda to sell; Richard Aldington had a deep resentment of the British "Establishment"; Suleiman Mousa was an employee of the Hashemites; Desmond Stewart apparently had some personal issues to work out. Monsieur Beraud-Villars views Lawrence as being fundamentally anti-French, blaming him for focusing "solely on the interests of Arab nationalism... and... neglect(ing) those of the Allies" (148). To reach this conclusion, Beraud-Villars engages in some special pleading and extreme applications of hindsight.<br />
<br />
For instance: Beraud-Villars argues that Britain and France "obvious interest lay in remaining closely united" (352). In hindsight, this indeed seems "obvious," but Beraud-Villars strangely ignores the centuries-old Anglo-French political and colonial rivalry that created the post-war tension. Lest we forget, their wartime alliance against Germany was an aberration, the two countries only two decades removed from Fashoda. Finally, Beraud-Villars sees the post-war settlement as sacrificing French goals in the Middle East for Arab ones, a mirror image of what actually happened.<br />
<br />
Beraud-Villars' allegation is not groundless. More recent authors like David
Fromkin and James Barr have shown the degree to which Britain and France
jockeyed for prestige and position in the region, even after nominally agreeing
to divide Turkish lands. However, it's simply wrong to suggest the British sold
the French out to a greater degree than the Arabs, whom they had misled into
fighting for independence. And to blame Lawrence, first and foremost, for the
dispute is extremely dubious.<br />
<br />
Did Lawrence hate France? Certainly he was a vocal opponent of France's imperial designs in Syria and Lebanon, desiring to "biff the French out of" those regions. On the other hand, he had a great love of French history and architecture, and was a lifelong admirer of French literature. Contrary to Beraud-Villars's depiction, he portrays the French contingent in the Hedjaz with respect in <span style="font-style: italic;">Seven Pillars</span>, if one overlooks his personal enmity towards Colonel Edouard Bremond. Speculating on "what humiliations, which incidents [had]... created in him... the strong enmity" towards France (20-21) takes the wrong track. Dislike of French policy is not hatred of France.<br />
<br />
It must also be noted that Beraud-Villars is extremely harsh towards the Arabs. Just a few examples: Beraud-Villars refers to the Bedouin as "semi-savages" (153), Syrian Arabs as "a heap of rootless bazaar-keepers and scoundrels" (210), and Iraq's population as "a few million illiterates" (285). All of the Revolt's successes are attributed to Lawrence and the other Allied advisers. His argument that an Anglo-French alliance was worthwhile "even if a few local patriotisms had to suffer" (352) is revealing. His views certainly reflect his time, when France was embroiled in a ferocious war in Algeria, but have a nasty ring to modern ears. After reading this, the resentment of George Antonius and Suleiman Mousa towards Western depictions of the Revolt becomes understandable.<br />
<br />
If we restrict ourselves to Beraud-Villars' portrait of Lawrence, however, the book is much more satisfactory. He's one of the few biographers to capture something of Lawrence's tortured complexity. Even if this Lawrence is anti-French, he's not <span style="font-style: italic;">only</span> anti-French. This Lawrence is a well-rounded, flawed but largely admirable man. <br />
<br />
Beraud-Villars takes Lawrence to task on a number of issues, including his account of the strategic interlude at Wadi Ais and his specific level of authority within the Arab Bureau. Beraud-Villars amusingly deflates <span style="font-style: italic;">Seven Pillars</span>'s account of Lawrence's first trip to the Hejaz: "Lawrence is certainly here abusing... the first person" (122). Most of all, he views Lawrence as an extremely neurotic individual, suffering from a "persecution mania" (336) and being essentially a split personality. In a particularly incisive comment, the author states that "no impostor ever made such sacrifice to make his imposture credible" (346), criticizing his mischievous treatment of biographers and ambivalent attitudes towards Lowell Thomas.<br />
<br />
In other ways, however, Beraud-Villars's portrayal of Lawrence is largely positive. He views Lawrence as, in many ways, an extraordinary personage, "one of the rare men... to have been at once a war leader and an artist" (xi). He refutes the view that Lawrence succeeded only due to money: "There was genuine popularity... which cupidity alone does not explain" (175). Lawrence is presented as a skilled military leader, a great writer, and, if anti-French and unduly pro-Arab, at least honest in his convictions. One can accept or reject what they want of this, but Beraud-Villars's attempt at a well-rounded portrait is admirable. As the book was written simultaneous to Aldington's <span style="font-style: italic;">Biographical Enquiry</span>, it shows that an extreme reaction to the "Lawrence Bureau" wasn't required for a more measured portrayal to occur.<br />
<br />
Beraud-Villars presents Lawrence as a latent homosexual and suggests a personal motive for Lawrence's northern ride. He's curiously reluctant to name Dahoum as S.A., on the bizarre grounds of Dahoum's lack of political sophistication, but doesn't present a credible alternative. He accepts Lawrence's account of Deraa uncritically, arguing that his vivid description of torture and male rape was crucial in shaping modern perceptions of political violence.<br />
<br />
Like most Lawrence biographies, <span style="font-style: italic;">T.E. Lawrence or the Search for the Absolute</span> mixes interesting presentation with speculation and politicking. Unlike most biographies, however, it presents a balanced, complex portrayal of Lawrence that is extremely commendable.Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-80737509482395375002011-04-18T07:22:00.000-07:002012-07-14T06:23:57.858-07:00T.E. Lawrence (1977, Desmond Stewart)<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiG_l8zPM68DOGv8wFRKuAepcGuGPt2BSUToUNgkJFgn4EoMgq8VNf2HBG4KFuEzNmNR4VzXkg6Euc9UMy7Hg8H3OpcpPI1IE_g8aJa9C8Bp5C8c8Vq0NTND4frgRumxybsYLFz6VGY6twC/s1600/Desmond+Stewart.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img $ca="true" border="0" height="320px" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiG_l8zPM68DOGv8wFRKuAepcGuGPt2BSUToUNgkJFgn4EoMgq8VNf2HBG4KFuEzNmNR4VzXkg6Euc9UMy7Hg8H3OpcpPI1IE_g8aJa9C8Bp5C8c8Vq0NTND4frgRumxybsYLFz6VGY6twC/s320/Desmond+Stewart.jpg" width="224px" /></a></div>
<br />
<strong>Publishing Info:</strong><br />
Stewart, Desmond. <em>T.E. Lawrence: A New Biography</em>. London: Harper and Row, 1977. 352 pp.<br />
<br />
<strong>Introduction: </strong><br />
Desmond Stewart was an expert journalist and Arab expert, and thus a seemingly ideal biographer for T.E. Lawrence. Instead, Stewart pens the worst major Lawrence biography, an indigestible mass of tabloid-style speculation and psychosexual fixation.<br />
<br />
<strong>The Author: </strong><br />
Desmond Stewart (1924-1981) was a British journalist, novelist, and historian who specialized in the Middle East, focusing mostly on Egypt. He died under mysterious circumstances in 1981, supposedly being poisoned. <br />
<br />
<strong>The Review: </strong><br />
Early chapters provide a respectable account of Lawrence's family life, time at Oxford and research at Carchemish. Attentive readers can spot warning signs, however. Stewart dismisses Janet Laurie's story of Lawrence's proposal as fanciful, ignoring John Mack's corroborating witnesses. He is similarly dismissive of Lawrence's pre-war service with the Royal Artillery. He dwells on Lawrence's relationships with Oxford classmate Vyvyan Richards and Arab servant Dahoum, along with his alleged ties to the Uranian movement of literary homosexuals. And the continued insinuations that Lawrence was "ignorant" of the Middle East (cf. 142, 291) grate.<br />
<br />
When Stewart reaches the Arab Revolt, however, he goes completely off the rails. To call Stewart's assertions "controversial" misses the mark. It might be politely termed invention, crafting a highly questionable picture of Lawrence. <br />
<br />
Stewart is hardly the first writer to question the veracity of Lawrence's "northern ride," his solitary reconnaissance into Syria during the Aqaba raid. Crucially, though, Richard Aldington and Suleiman Mousa did so without having official documentation released in 1969. Stewart does those gentlemen one better, dismissing the documentation and relying on the Arab sources employed by Mousa. But Stewart can't let well-enough alone: he says Lawrence "may have ridden off... in a search for news of Dahoum" (167). What's his evidence for this? Nothing. Not a footnote, source, or citation of any kind.<br />
<br />
Many authors from Mousa on question Lawrence's claims of being captured and raped at Deraa. But Stewart isn't content with skepticism. Instead, he advances an unlikely theory that Lawrence allowed himself to be flogged by Sherif Ali ibn al-Harithi at Azrak, partially as self-punishment and partially for sexual release. He subsequently invented the story as a "metamorphosis [of] guilt and failure into a myth of degradation and torture" (188).<br />
<br />
The best evidence he can summon: Lawrence was flogged by his mother as a child; Ali was physically attractive; a cryptic conversation with his aide, Rolls, months later, about Lawrence's supposed "imprisonment" (pp. 188-189). That's his entire basis for this extraordinary allegation. That, one suspects, and a healthy dose of imagination.<br />
<br />
Later, Stewart claims Lawrence conspired with Nuri al-Said, Feisal's right-hand man and later Prime Minister of Iraq, to assassinate Syrian rival Abd el-Kader. Stewart's source is Subhi al-Umari, a pro-Kader police officer in a memoir written decades later. One wouldn't disqualify al-Umari's account on this basis, except Stewart seems content to dismiss Janet Laurie, the testimony of the boys involved in Lawrence's accident and others because of "the unreliability of memory" (30). <br />
<br />
And why did Lawrence do this? Because "Abd el Kader had denounced Dahoum" (210) to the Turkish authorities. Again, he evades <em>Seven Pillars</em>, not so much critiquing Lawrence's account of Kader's treachery during the Yarmuk raid and later, as ignoring it. Nor does he present evidence supporting his version. Stewart's claim that "Lawrence never adequately explained his hatred of Abdel Kader" (209) is simply incorrect.<br />
<br />
Stewart dissects <em>Seven Pillars</em> at length, viewing it as literature rather than memoir. He tries to portray Farraj and Daud, and Deraa, as symbolic of Lawrence's own relationships rather than things that actually happened, regardless of other historians' conclusions. Lawrence's execution of Ahmed is presented as implausible because "Lawrence was still bound by the King's regulations" while with the Arabs (245). He also questionably argues that the book's view of Arab nationalism and prose style were influenced by others, rather than being Lawrence's own thoughts/invention.<br />
<br />
Stewart is convinced that Lawrence was a fascist, based on his relationship with Oswald Mosley acolyte Henry Williamson, Lawrence's own detailed descriptions of violence in <em>Seven Pillars</em>, his interest in rebels like Lenin and Roger Casement, admiration for the proletariat and supposed militarism. "The Fascist ethos would be more important to a man with Lawrence's blend of the radical and the authoritarian" (296). This, despite an earlier assertion that Lawrence was not an "ideologist" (209) and was motivated on a purely personal level. <br />
<br />
Stewart's remaining credibility evaporates in the final chapters, when he posits Lawrence was murdered. Stewart dismisses the testimony of the two boys involved in the accident, claiming that "boys are bad witnesses" (302), insinuating further they were "under pressure from their fathers, minor cogs in the military machine" (303). Stewart obsesses over the "black car" reported by a single witness, and considers it suspicious that detectives were later sent to Lawrence's home and hospital bed. This theory was well-debunked by Knightley and Simpson eight years before and scarcely deserves a response.<br />
<br />
Politely, Stewart is his own worst enemy. It is all well and good to critique Lawrence's cavalier attitude towards the truth, something even his admirers concede. But one undercuts their position by discarding documentary evidence for naked speculation. Certainly Stewart's bizarre Deraa story and entertainment of conspiracy theories about Lawrence's death strain credulity.<br />
<br />
While skeptical towards Lawrence's writings, Stewart is happy to marshal dubious sources for his own case. He accepts Richard Meintertzhagen's suspect writings without critique, partly because of his "bluff, masculine personality" (225). His account of Lawrence's supposed sexual involvement with the crime boss "Bluebeard" originates from a German tabloid. Similarly, his willingness to credit Arab sources with a grudge against Lawrence and the Hashemites indicates a determination to arrange facts around a thesis.<br />
<br />
Stewart uses this sleight-of-hand to craft a meretricious portrait of Lawrence: a habitual liar, a proto-Fascist, an active homosexual. All of these are defensible positions, advanced by other biographers. Again though, basing them around speculation and selective omission is, at best, self-confirmation. At worst, it's stretching the truth. For advancing bizarre, untenable theories without evidence, Desmond Stewart does himself and his subject a great disservice.<br />
<br />
<strong>What Others Say:</strong><br />
<strong><br /></strong>"Completely unsupported assertions about T. E. make this one of the stupidest and most asinine books written about T. E. - or anyone else for that matter." - <a href="http://www.coopertoons.com/merryhistory/lawrenceofarabia/lawrenceofarabia.html">CooperToons</a><br />
<br />
"Every critic knows that a crime style of sorts is responsible for a bad book... [Stewart's] crime style is as multiple as it is singular." - Nigel Dennis, <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1977/sep/29/rigging-the-lawrence-case/">New York Review of Books</a><br />
<br />
"Stewart's singular contribution to this debate is to demonstrate that unverified and wild assertions will no longer go unchallenged, no matter how clever they are." - Stephen E. Tabachnick<br />
<br />
"Worthless and untenable." - <a href="http://telawrencestudies.org/telawrencestudies/general_biography/sense_and_nonsense.htm">Jeremy Wilson</a><br />
<br />
“If you accept Mr. Stewart’s thesis—and I do—then the core of virtually every Lawrence biography collapses like a desert sandcastle.”<sup id="fnr9-591182090"></sup> - <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1978/feb/09/snuggling-with-lawrence/#fnr8-152120658">Phillip Knightley</a><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
"Closely reasoned, level-headed and revealing." - Brian Vintcent, <em>The Globe and Mail</em>Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-38418500315916076022011-04-17T12:14:00.001-07:002011-04-19T15:26:46.372-07:00Lawrence the Rebel (1946, Edward Robinson)<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjNN9SqkObDTD2UpqzVDxTlCUuRl14XlClyulTyJv_8Kjt0lKywJFLTsc6Yfvp9g_fGphzoRiSA_Se9xXbbd-FsRBAdETlID4EH6cdqMqLQ9E805aQikBye8Bsp4le7vdJonVpwRV144I3h/s1600/DSCN3261.JPG"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 320px; height: 240px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjNN9SqkObDTD2UpqzVDxTlCUuRl14XlClyulTyJv_8Kjt0lKywJFLTsc6Yfvp9g_fGphzoRiSA_Se9xXbbd-FsRBAdETlID4EH6cdqMqLQ9E805aQikBye8Bsp4le7vdJonVpwRV144I3h/s320/DSCN3261.JPG" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5596634975309390818" /></a><br /><strong>Publishing Info:</strong><br /><br />Robinson, Edward. <em>Lawrence the Rebel</em>. London: Folcroft Library, 1979 (limited library edition). Originally published in 1946 by Lincolns-Prager, London.<br /><br /><strong>Introduction:</strong><br /><br />Edward Robinson's <em>Lawrence the Rebel</em> is one of the most obscure Lawrence biographies, and with good reason: it's not very good. Aside from providing a somewhat first-hand account of Lawrence's exploits, this slim volume doesn't add much to a reader's understanding of Lawrence or the Arab Revolt. And that's not to mention the myriad credibility issues.<br /><br /><strong>The Author:</strong><br /><br />The only info I could find about Robinson is that he served with the Egyptian Expeditionary Force (EEF) under Allenby during World War I, and was at some point attached to the British military mission in the Hejaz. Or so he claims: several biographers dispute the veracity of his service, and he in fact was arrested for forgery in 1927.<br /><br /><strong>The Review:</strong><br /><br /><em>Lawrence the Rebel</em> deserves notice for two reasons. One, it was written by someone who served with Lawrence during the war, and he provides a unique perspective on Lawrence's exploits in Arabia, if not the man himself. Two, it's probably the first biography that doesn't go for straight hero-worship of Lawrence. Robinson views Lawrence as a great man but isn't uncritical of him.<br /><br />Otherwise, this slim volume doesn't add much to the Lawrence literature. Like most of the early biographies, it focuses almost exclusively on Lawrence's time in the Arab Revolt. Robinson provides a lot of primary documents and official reports that, while interesting in a way, make for rather dry reading. While Robinson provides a detailed account of the Revolt, both on the ground and in its political machinations, he devotes comparatively little time to Lawrence himself, and the book barely qualifies as a biography.<br /><br />Robinson's portrait of Lawrence, such as it is, is fairly flat and uninteresting. He does provide a few nuggets of interest: his account of Lawrence's changes in personality after Deraa, for instance, does much to confirm that incident's veracity, and he shows knowledge of Lawrence's attempts to negotiate a settlement between Arabs and Zionists, something scarce mentioned in the early Lawrence books. Of course, how much of this he actually knew at the time, and how much of it comes after the fact, isn't entirely clear, and certain sensational bits - Lawrence's "northern ride" during the Aqaba campaign now includes attending a German-Turkish military conference in Damascus incognito! - don't help his credibility. <br /><br />Giving Robinson the benefit of the doubt, this adds some nice pieces to the Lawrence puzzle. If nothing else, Robinson should be remembered as the first biographer to advance the theory that Deraa inspired Lawrence's actions at Tafas. But overall, the portrait of Lawrence is flat, focused almost entirely on a military level; and the broad scope of the story doesn't even ensure that.<br /><br /><em>Lawrence the Rebel</em> has faded into obscurity for a pretty good reason. It's dryly written and not especially insightful, and too hard-to-find to be worth checking out.<br /><br /><span style="font-weight:bold;">What Others Say:</span><br /><br />"Presents some interesting ideas, but... has been neglected." - Stephen E. TabachnickGroggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-27451483508197734462011-04-16T09:45:00.000-07:002011-04-19T15:33:37.232-07:00A Prince of Our Disorder: The Life of T.E. Lawrence (1976, John E. Mack)<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj6XVe3YSir-0fKm1sBSOzLO2Luvmi_xikcc-KnL452KDfUfWONpMc-VCO-qFxC8CW3OlQSSUTlwKY0JMS1KejLTcjRxpwHg5uZeQk_OCBr-nsc6xwgsopR9DNhamAogxkztipkixMShiRd/s1600/Prince.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 197px; height: 320px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj6XVe3YSir-0fKm1sBSOzLO2Luvmi_xikcc-KnL452KDfUfWONpMc-VCO-qFxC8CW3OlQSSUTlwKY0JMS1KejLTcjRxpwHg5uZeQk_OCBr-nsc6xwgsopR9DNhamAogxkztipkixMShiRd/s320/Prince.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5596224715611770866" /></a><br /><strong>Publishing Info:</strong><br /><br />Mack, John E. <em>A Prince of Our Disorder: The Life of T.E. Lawrence</em>. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1976. 561 pp.<br /><br /><strong>Introduction:</strong><br /><br /><em>A Prince of Our Disorder</em> is, by a pretty wide margin, the best Lawrence biography I've read. Mixing impeccable research with insightful analysis, Mack creates the most complex and complete portrait of Lawrence to date. Unlike other writers who try and delve into Lawrence's psyche, Mack actually has the credentials to do so, and despite minor flaws <em>Prince</em> is extremely convincing.<br /><br /><strong>The Author:</strong><br /><br /><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjC0ei_qI-DZJwkVZNPZHLQz6b0qEdJFDZTE5Nbnl3UxtLJWrFVJOPjL5MVC6rWrrw5XnyWnOShWzJfPRdEjM9sFOrkbnOulgK6BEPtmnFCsC0ROaVMzaoYFM7e6y6nxCBxuXftq6VZLnNF/s1600/John+E.+Mack.jpg"><img style="display:block; margin:0px auto 10px; text-align:center;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 256px; height: 320px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjC0ei_qI-DZJwkVZNPZHLQz6b0qEdJFDZTE5Nbnl3UxtLJWrFVJOPjL5MVC6rWrrw5XnyWnOShWzJfPRdEjM9sFOrkbnOulgK6BEPtmnFCsC0ROaVMzaoYFM7e6y6nxCBxuXftq6VZLnNF/s320/John+E.+Mack.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5596224864820777554" /></a><br /><br />John Edward Mack (1929-2004) was a psychiatrist and Professor of Psychology at Harvard Medical School. Interested in how a person's worldview affects their actions and relationships with others, Mack wrote several books on dreams, nightmares and suicide before tackling Lawrence. Mack won a Pulitzer Prize for <em>Prince</em>, but is best-remembered today for his controversial works on alien abduction. He died in a car accident in 2004.<br /><br /><strong>The Review:</strong><br /><br />In a nutshell, Mack's book has everything you'd want from a biography. It's more accessible than Jeremy Wilson's tome, more insightful (and credible) than Anthony Nutting and Desmond Stewart, and more balanced than most any other account.<br /><br />Mack's greatest strength is his relative objectivity. Writing an objective account of Lawrence is a difficult proposition, and Mack probably comes as close to a balanced portrayal as possible. Perhaps because he advances from a psychological vantage point, Mack avoids the political and historical pre-occupations of other biographers, taking Lawrence on his own terms as man heroic and admirable, but also flawed and extremely tortured.<br /><br />The genre of "psycho-biography" has become much-maligned, but Mack here shows its practical applications. Where a Richard Aldington might simply use Lawrence's writings and private correspondence to divine his personality, Mack engaged in exhaustive research to profile his subject: interviews with Lawrence's friends, family and acquaintances, primary source documents. Mack's hobby horse, viewing all of Lawrence's actions as personal rather than idealistic, has its drawbacks, namely in elliding the greater ramifications of Lawrence's life. On the other hand, though, it allows for a deep and insightful analysis of an ever-elusive individual.<br /><br />Mack portrays Lawrence as, essentially, a boy who never went through a proper adolescence. In Mack's view, Lawrence's odd home life, with parents living out of wedlock (yet the mother fanatically religious), combined with Lawrence's love of history and literature to create a strangely stilted personality. Analyzing Lawrence's relationship with John Bruce, the Tanks Corps soldier Lawrence persuaded to flog him, Mack writes that Lawrence's personality was "vividly... split... between the adult and childhood aspects of himself, which... he never fully integrated" (439). This seems a spot-on analysis of a man who, until the end of his life, reveled in deliberate misdirection, playful exaggeration, silly practical jokes and a rather childish view of sex. And it might also account for his "craving to be famous; and a horror of being known to like being known."<br /><br />Drawing on Lawrence's childhood preoccupations with romantic literature and the Crusades, Mack hypothesizes that Lawrence's Arab exploits were a real life extension of his "hero fantasies" (100), relishing the chance to play Richard the Lionheart or Sir Gallahad in real life. If one accepts Mack's argument that Lawrence never fully matured, this portrait seems extremely plausible. It certainly accounts for the epic style and florid language of <em>Seven Pillars</em>, his comparisons of Feisal and Auda abu Tayi to medieval knights, and his schizophrenic view of war as both good fun and utter horror.<br /><br />Instead of focusing on Lawrence's need for "father figures" like Hogarth, Storrs and Allenby, Mack provides a more complex view of Lawrence's relationships. Whatever the difficulties with his parents, Lawrence had a warm and loving affection for his brothers, especially Arnold. Some of the most interesting sections involved Lawrence's very close relationship with Jimmy Newcombe, the son of Lawrence's wartime colleague Colonel Stewart Newcombe. The testimony of Lawrence's service mates in the Tank Corps and RAF show a great deal of affection for "Private Shaw." Through this analysis, Lawrence's relations with Arabs like Selim Ahmed and Emir Feisal can be viewed in a more complete light.<br /><br />Mack spends a lot of time discussing Lawrence's sexual predilections. Mack mostly avoids the puerile "Was Lawrence gay?" debate that's raged since Aldington, seeing it as almost irrelevant. Instead, Mack views Lawrence as essentially incapable of physical love, both remarkably ignorant of and disgusted by "self-degradation." Deraa only exacerbated Lawrence's neuroses, channelling them into disturbing, self-destructive impulses. He also shows that, contrary to many biographies, Lawrence was not a misogynist - indeed, he had many female friends, including Charlotte Shaw, Gertrude Bell and Lady Astor. And Mack disputes the preoccupation with <em>Seven Pillars</em>'s description of Bedouin homosexuality, arguing that his candor "must not be confused... with what Lawrence would or could tolerate in himself" (425).<br /><br />Mack was the first to uncover the story of Janet Laurie. A childhood friend of Lawrence's, Laurie was shocked when a twenty-one year old Lawrence spontaneously proposed to her. Other writers have cast doubt on Laurie's veracity, especially since she didn't publicly come forward for decades. But Mack finds other witnesses - including Reverend E.H. Hall, an Oxford acquaintance of Lawrence's - to corroborate the story. If one accepts Laurie, it certainly complicates matters for the Aldington/Stewart/Lawrence James school who bluntly state Lawrence was gay.<br /><br />Like many biographers, Mack places particular emphasis on Deraa. Mack concludes that "Lawrence underwent a painful, humiliating assault at Deraa... and the element of sexual pleasure he experienced... was particularly intolerable and shameful to him" (233). And yet Lawrence felt compelled to relive the experience, through John Bruce at least, "serv(ing) to gratify... the very desire for which Lawrence needed to be punished" (439). In Mack's eyes, Lawrence's inconsistent accounts of Deraa are an unwillingness to fully confront the incident, despite his need "to make... private suffering a matter of public record" (228).<br /><br />By focusing on Lawrence's personality, the historical ramifications of Lawrence's actions get relatively short shrift. Mack recuses himself of analyzing Lawrence's military or political achievements - fair enough for a psychologist, but still a cop-out. At the very least, though, Mack convincingly argues that Lawrence was neither a cynical imperialist nor a naive Arab nationalist, rather doing his best to reconcile these oppositional viewpoints. Certainly he rebuts Knightley and Simpson's assumption that Lawrence was an intelligence agent before the war, claiming that "Lawrence hardly behaved like the model secret agent" (103). And, citing writer Anis Sayigh's work and the testimony of Bedouin who knew Lawrence during the war, he shows that Arabs hold (or held) Lawrence in more esteem than Suleiman Mousa suggests.<br /><br /><em>A Prince of Our Disorder</em> will likely remain the definitive Lawrence biography for years to come. Mack's well-rounded portrait of Lawrence confirms his view of the man as "one of the most moving personal sagas" (459) ever, and stands as a really excellent book.<br /><br /><strong>What Others Say:</strong><br /><br />"Clearly a book that tries to be objective and discusses the pros and cons of whether T. E. told the truth or not. John was a psychiastrist at Harvard Medical School and yet the book doesn't fall into trying to figure out history by psychoanalyzing the subject... This book deserved its Pulitzer Prize." - <a href="http://www.coopertoons.com/merryhistory/lawrenceofarabia/lawrenceofarabia.html">CooperToons</a><br /><br />"A balanced answer to the Aldington-inspired line of criticism: it was the most serious and solid of all Lawrence biographies ever to appear up to the end of 1987." - Stephen E. Tabachnick<br /><br />"I most admire John E. Mack's <em>A Prince of Our Disorder: The Life of T. E. Lawrence</em> (1976) for its thoroughness and sensitivity." - June Turner, <a href="http://www.pep-web.org/document.php?id=aim.048.0395a"><em>Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing</em></a><br /><br />The following quotes from <a href="http://experiencers.com/books-by-john-e-mack/">Mack's website</a>:<br /><br />“A hugely admired, and Pulitzer prize-winning, biography which concentrates on the relationship between Lawrence’s inner life and the actions and events which grew out of them. It is easy to warm to a biographer who, while drawing on his training as a psychiatrist, is never deceived into thinking that theory can ‘explain’ his Lawrence. The more Mack discovered about the social contexts of Lawrence’s actions and the demands on a public man, the more he understood Lawrence’s psychology. The result is a resounding confirmation of this approach to his subject.” — Desmond Christy, <em>The Guardian</em> <br /><br />“Unlike many ‘psycho-biographies’, this was written by a trained psychologist who had also done his biographer’s homework: it remains the best biography of T.E. Lawrence.” — <em>Contemporary Review </em><br /><br />“Takes us closer to the core of Lawrence than any previous biography.” - <em>Time</em><br /><br />“A great book which honors its subject, its form, and its author.” - <em>Boston Globe</em>Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-70297667094347205962011-04-14T08:43:00.001-07:002011-04-14T08:47:24.480-07:00Update and Self-PromotionDue to a busy class and work schedule, I haven't made much progress on the Stewart, Robinson or Armitage biographies. I still hope to have a review of whichever I finish first up soon, as well as a review of Korda's <em>Hero</em>.<br /><br />On the plus side, I was recently hired by the online website <a href="http://www.suite101.com/">Suite101</a>, and my first published article is basically <a href="http://www.suite101.com/content/writing-about-lawrence-of-arabia-a365907">a compressed-into-1,000-words version of this blog</a>.Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-84702396225916859142011-04-07T02:25:00.000-07:002012-08-09T17:48:13.424-07:00Lawrence of Arabia: The Man and the Motive (1961, Anthony Nutting)<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-KVZcgDjrHXjBsWud5nOXwzJGYMyaT1zds7bWo69ZIT0IgD8wFVrL64PwNtOC4lqSowbi-DKxtBSasXgmsJTqdS5oq6JRxaFOO8hRygy8Z4Cbw7REDRn8WUa8W3uR_xNCj1Rj54VNx-U/s1600/Man+and+the+Motive.jpg"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5549299144514808130" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjm-KVZcgDjrHXjBsWud5nOXwzJGYMyaT1zds7bWo69ZIT0IgD8wFVrL64PwNtOC4lqSowbi-DKxtBSasXgmsJTqdS5oq6JRxaFOO8hRygy8Z4Cbw7REDRn8WUa8W3uR_xNCj1Rj54VNx-U/s320/Man+and+the+Motive.jpg" style="cursor: hand; cursor: pointer; display: block; height: 240px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 320px;" /></a><br />
<br />
<b>Publishing Info:</b><br />
<br />
Nutting, Anthony. <i>Lawrence of Arabia: The Man and the Motive</i>. London: Hollis and Carter, 1961. 256 pp.<br />
<br />
<b>Introduction</b><br />
<br />
I'm surprised that Anthony Nutting's 1961 biography isn't better-remembered. It may be one of the most influential: Nutting was an adviser on the film <i>Lawrence of Arabia</i> (1962), and his depiction of Lawrence as a tormented sadomasochist undoubtedly influenced David Lean and Robert Bolt's depiction of Lawrence in said movie. Besides this cultural influence, <i>The Man and the Motive</i> is a mixed bag, mixing good storytelling with often-shaky history.<br />
<br />
<b>The Author:</b><br />
<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjTgz0CF8D2G6mOOpDdeZlJuwo-9LeqnQgizSOl1nIL3y4KbDmVXWlejwz_ikYmyuUMiu4qa9LIW7XxxMRYqwdijwfgYU8I5gLe_VCCS3XPagDTcKSYZoq8pB4vrJrJ78tIYShx0_N8d6Lh/s1600/Nutting.jpg"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5549296542500372786" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjTgz0CF8D2G6mOOpDdeZlJuwo-9LeqnQgizSOl1nIL3y4KbDmVXWlejwz_ikYmyuUMiu4qa9LIW7XxxMRYqwdijwfgYU8I5gLe_VCCS3XPagDTcKSYZoq8pB4vrJrJ78tIYShx0_N8d6Lh/s320/Nutting.jpg" style="cursor: hand; cursor: pointer; display: block; height: 320px; margin: 0px auto 10px; text-align: center; width: 264px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Sir Anthony Nutting (1920-1999) was the scion of a wealthy British family. During World War II he served in various diplomatic posts and in 1945 was elected to Parliament at the age of 25. Despite his youth he became a major player in the Conservative Party, becoming Privy Councilor in 1954, serving in Winston Churchill's second Cabinet as Minister of State for Foreign Affairs and leading two delegations to the United Nations. <br />
<br />
An Arabist who encouraged friendly relations between Britain and the Middle East, Nutting helped negotiate the turnover of the Suez Canal to Egypt in 1954. However, he was aghast when the British and French decided to "knock [Abdul] Nasser from his perch" by invading Egypt two years later. Nutting resigned in disgust over the resulting Suez Crisis, ruining his political career, though he remained in the public eye as an historian and political commentator for decades.<br />
<br />
Parenthetically, Lawrence may be one of the few cases where a man's biographers are as interesting as their subject. Between Nutting, Graves, Aldington and Lowell Thomas, we have a number of men as worthy of lengthy biographies as Lawrence.<br />
<br />
<b>The Review:</b><br />
<br />
In <i>Images of Lawrence</i>, Stephen Tabachnick attacks Nutting for a lack of original research and a lot of speculation. This is a valid criticism, as <i>The Man and the Motive</i> essentially boils down past accounts of Lawrence's life and actions to a simple form, with some brief chapters of analysis and examination. That said, it's also one of the most readable, straightforward Lawrence biographies.<br />
<br />
Nutting's main virtue is accessibility. He structures his biography like a novel (or a film script?), with events clearly laid out. This isn't always to the benefit of the book, with Nutting indulging in speculative dialogue and analysis on occasion. But his prose is crisp and the book flows perfectly, so for pure readibility it comes highly recommended. Of course, for historical works readability isn't the only consideration.<br />
<br />
Nutting's portrayal reflects the general debate on Lawrence circa 1961 - eg., the scholarly community still reeling from Richard Aldington's broadside, and trying to reconcile it with the traditional Lowell Thomas/Robert Graves portrayal. To Nutting's credit, he avoids either extreme, seeking a balanced portrayal of Lawrence rather than deifying or demonizing him. His account of the Arab Revolt is straight out of <i>Seven Pillars</i> with some brief sections on his pre- and post-war life, but this is an issue of presentation His history is generally good; his view of Lawrence may raise an eyebrow.<br />
<br />
Nutting portrays Lawrence as admirable in many ways, but a tortured, self-contradictory one, who mixes heroism and idealism with vanity and neurosis. He mostly abstains from direct analysis until the final chapter, fittingly entitled "The Motive," where he tries to determine "What... lay(s) at the root of the Lawrence enigma?" (p. 237). So again we have a biographer thinking there's a definite "key" to Lawrence. And without the psychological training of a John Mack or the documentation of a Knightley and Simpson, Nutting's interpretation is questionable.<br />
<br />
Nutting rejects some of Aldington's more egregious speculations, namely that Lawrence was a pathological liar or a homosexual. However, he does agree that Lawrence was a "rabid masochist" (p. 244), and goes a step further in arguing that Deraa is the key to all his subsequent actions - not least the Tafas Massacre. Edward Robinson made a similar argument in his <i>Lawrence the Rebel</i>, but this seems idle speculation at best, misrepresentation at worst. If <i>Seven Pillars</i> is accurate, Lawrence's failures during the Dead Sea Campaign, and general guilt over misleading the Arabs, prompted him to try and resign, not Deraa. As for Tafas, biographers needn't engage in psychological speculation: Lawrence's vivid account of the Turkish atrocities beforehand should suffice for a reason. <br />
<br />
Nutting's overall depiction of Lawrence is mixed. Much of his account rings true, if overly simplified. His depiction of Lawrence as a "Kingmaker" (p. 36), though harmed by silly "thought" dialogue, seems accurate, and for much of the book Nutting draws a good bead on Lawrence's basic motivations: a mixture of genuine idealism and personal ambition. Nutting is also credible in portraying Lawrence's relationships with Feisal, Auda and Allenby. Finally, Nutting commendably points out Lawrence's mutual sympathy for pan-Arabism <b>and</b> Zionism, where many authors (Suleiman Mousa) see these beliefs as inherently incompatible. <br />
<br />
On the other hand, Nutting's depiction of Lawrence's "northern ride" during the Aqaba campaign as a "compulsive act of bravado" (p. 75) seems ridiculous. Rather than rebut Lawrence's stated reasons (intelligence reasons plus a guilt-driven, self-destructive impulse) he claims it "unlikely" and substitutes his own speculation. After Nutting's account of Tafas: "If... Lawrence was able to see into his soul... he must have been among the most tortured of God's creatures" (p. 163). This is psychological profiling by someone lacking the qualifications.<br />
<br />
There's also the minor quibble that Nutting spends two-three pages rebutting Terence Rattigan's depiction of Deraa in his controversial play <i>Ross</i>, which has Lawrence deliberately raped by Hajim Bey to break his spirit. I agree with his conclusions but I wonder what the point is; after all, <i>Ross </i>isn't intended as anything more than fiction.<br />
<br />
<br />
In spite of its flaws, <i>Lawrence of Arabia: The Man and the Motive</i> stands as a decent pre-1969 biography. As a work of ground-breaking scholarship it isn't great, though Nutting is ahead of his time in some of his conclusions. As an entertaining, readable, if occasionally suspect, biography, it's cautiously recommended.<br />
<br />
<b>What Others Say:</b><br />
<br />
"Not much new here, and it basically assumes T.E. told the truth." - <a href="http://www.coopertoons.com/merryhistory/lawrenceofarabia/lawrenceofarabia.html">CooperToons</a><br />
<br />
"The best short book (on Lawrence)." - Thomas Jackson, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/forbes-life-magazine/2005/0905/100.html">Forbes Magazine</a><br />
<br />
"Offers interpretation rather than concrete new evidence about Lawrence." - Stephen E. Tabachnick<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,938850-1,00.html">Time Magazine review</a>Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3692649928820274203.post-40112299858214181112011-04-05T18:21:00.000-07:002011-04-05T18:28:25.097-07:00I'm back!Apologies for the three-month hiatus; I've been busy with school (I'm graduating at the end of this month) and areas of other interest. <br /><br />I just finished Michael Korda's <span style="font-style:italic;">Hero</span> and will have reviews of that and Anthony Nutting's <span style="font-style:italic;">The Man and the Motive</span> up soon. I also ordered a bunch of rather obscure Lawrence books, including those by Desmond Stewart, Edward Robinson and Florence Armitage, so stay tuned for that.<br /><br />In the meantime, I just came across <a href="http://www.maartenschild.com/lawrence/">this excellent blog</a> by Maarten Schild, an historian and Lawrence scholar. I recommend you check it out while I sort through the new material.Groggy Dundeehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14990254767008162244noreply@blogger.com0